In this paper, we address the problem of sabotage in tournaments with heterogeneous contestants. In a first step, we develop a formal model, which yields the prediction that favorites exert higher productive effort, while underdogs are more tempted to engage in destructive actions (sabotage). This is because favorites have a higher return on productive effort and both types of effort are substitutes. In a second step, we use data from German professional soccer to test this prediction. In line with the model, we find that favorite teams win more tackles in a fair way, while underdog teams commit more fouls
In many situations, agents compete for a fixed number of attractive positions awarded on the basis o...
We empirically investigate whether tournaments between heterogeneous contestants are less intense. T...
The attacking performance in elite soccer is a complex process that is influenced by several situati...
Deutscher C, Frick B, Gürtler O, Prinz J. Sabotage in Tournaments with Heterogeneous Contestants: Em...
We exploit an incentive change in professional soccer leagues aimed at encouraging more attacking an...
This paper studies sabotage in tournaments with at least three contestants, where the contestants kn...
When effort is multidimensional and output may not be precisely observed, incentives can have perver...
This paper provides an empirical investigation of misconducts in contests based on data from europea...
This paper provides an empirical investigation of misconducts in contests based on data from europea...
In this paper a tournament between teams (a collective tournament) is ana-lyzed, where each contesta...
This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the fin...
This paper examines properties of sabotage among workers under promotion tournaments. Under the one-...
How do the rewards for a victory influence the soccer teams ’ offensiveness? The authors argue that ...
How do the rewards for a victory influence the soccer teams ’ offensiveness? The authors argue that ...
In this paper a tournament between teams (a collective tournament) is analyzed, where each contestan...
In many situations, agents compete for a fixed number of attractive positions awarded on the basis o...
We empirically investigate whether tournaments between heterogeneous contestants are less intense. T...
The attacking performance in elite soccer is a complex process that is influenced by several situati...
Deutscher C, Frick B, Gürtler O, Prinz J. Sabotage in Tournaments with Heterogeneous Contestants: Em...
We exploit an incentive change in professional soccer leagues aimed at encouraging more attacking an...
This paper studies sabotage in tournaments with at least three contestants, where the contestants kn...
When effort is multidimensional and output may not be precisely observed, incentives can have perver...
This paper provides an empirical investigation of misconducts in contests based on data from europea...
This paper provides an empirical investigation of misconducts in contests based on data from europea...
In this paper a tournament between teams (a collective tournament) is ana-lyzed, where each contesta...
This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the fin...
This paper examines properties of sabotage among workers under promotion tournaments. Under the one-...
How do the rewards for a victory influence the soccer teams ’ offensiveness? The authors argue that ...
How do the rewards for a victory influence the soccer teams ’ offensiveness? The authors argue that ...
In this paper a tournament between teams (a collective tournament) is analyzed, where each contestan...
In many situations, agents compete for a fixed number of attractive positions awarded on the basis o...
We empirically investigate whether tournaments between heterogeneous contestants are less intense. T...
The attacking performance in elite soccer is a complex process that is influenced by several situati...