A Kritikai Jogi Tanulmányok, mint jogszociológiai mozgalom és intellektuális következményei

In this study I attempt to work of a movement of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) and its intellectual “aftermath”. The CLS was to critique liberal legalism by demystifying its doctrines, for instance ideology or legal reasoning. The popular belief is every legal conflict has a correct and logical answer in the process of judicial decision, but it is in reality indeterminate and contradictory. For the reasons, the political and social power among us within social economic, political inquiries, and beliefs created by capitalism social and economic systems. Summing up: our legal system is not much but a shadow of individuals in a system of a world of hierarchy and power of differential classes. Within that work I attempt to show some scholars how this problem wanted to explain. For instance (Duncan Kennedy, Clare Dalton). Moreover how criticised this way of thinking by some scholars (for example Robin West from view of feminism, or Richard Delgado from view of minorities)