Risk adjustment of quality measures using clinical risk factors is widely accepted; risk adjustment using social risk factors remains controversial. We argue here that social risk adjustment is appropriate and necessary in defined circumstances and that social risk adjustment should be the default option when there are valid empirical arguments for and against adjustment for a given measure. Social risk adjustment is an important way to avoid exacerbating inequity in the health care system
Introduction: Since 2014, Swiss home care organizations have had the possibility to use the results ...
Risk adjustment is a critical tool in public reporting of quality measures. Its aim is to level the ...
Risk adjustment as currently implemented or proposed has two important weaknesses. First, health ins...
The National Quality Forum (NQF) recently convenedan expert panel to make recommendations on a much-...
Risk adjustment—statistical methods to account for patient-related factors when computing outcome me...
In recent years many academics, health care providers, and third-party payers have focused their att...
Risk adjustment is used to make payments or allow comparisons of outcomes while controlling for exog...
Adjustments for the underlying differences in risks among patients in payment approaches has been wi...
In the U.S. health care system, payments and performance measures are often adjusted to account for ...
Direct and indirect standardization procedures aim at comparing differences in health or differences...
Widespread integration of market-based incentives into healthcare systems calls for — and has elicit...
The main objective of risk adjustment in systems of regulated competition on health insurance market...
A risk adjustment scheme (RAS) within social health insurance is designed to prevent insurers from e...
We argue that a sharp distinction must be made between the empirical problem of finding the best equ...
The main objective of risk adjustment in systems of regulated competition on healthinsurance markets...
Introduction: Since 2014, Swiss home care organizations have had the possibility to use the results ...
Risk adjustment is a critical tool in public reporting of quality measures. Its aim is to level the ...
Risk adjustment as currently implemented or proposed has two important weaknesses. First, health ins...
The National Quality Forum (NQF) recently convenedan expert panel to make recommendations on a much-...
Risk adjustment—statistical methods to account for patient-related factors when computing outcome me...
In recent years many academics, health care providers, and third-party payers have focused their att...
Risk adjustment is used to make payments or allow comparisons of outcomes while controlling for exog...
Adjustments for the underlying differences in risks among patients in payment approaches has been wi...
In the U.S. health care system, payments and performance measures are often adjusted to account for ...
Direct and indirect standardization procedures aim at comparing differences in health or differences...
Widespread integration of market-based incentives into healthcare systems calls for — and has elicit...
The main objective of risk adjustment in systems of regulated competition on health insurance market...
A risk adjustment scheme (RAS) within social health insurance is designed to prevent insurers from e...
We argue that a sharp distinction must be made between the empirical problem of finding the best equ...
The main objective of risk adjustment in systems of regulated competition on healthinsurance markets...
Introduction: Since 2014, Swiss home care organizations have had the possibility to use the results ...
Risk adjustment is a critical tool in public reporting of quality measures. Its aim is to level the ...
Risk adjustment as currently implemented or proposed has two important weaknesses. First, health ins...