The integration of realist evaluation principles within randomised controlled trials ('realist RCTs') enables evaluations of complex interventions to answer questions about what works, for whom and under what circumstances. This allows evaluators to better develop and refine mid-level programme theories. However, this is only one phase in the process of developing and evaluating complex interventions. We describe and exemplify how social scientists can integrate realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework. Intervention development, modelling, and feasibility and pilot studies need to theorise the contextual conditions necessary for intervention mechanisms to be activated. Where interventions are scaled up ...
Background: The realist approach is a form of theory-driven evaluation developed to strengthen the e...
In this paper, we respond to a paper by Jamal and colleagues published in Trials in October 2015 and...
Realist evaluation asks ‘how and why do interventions work or not work, for whom, and in what circum...
Randomized trials of complex public health interventions generally aim to identify what works, accre...
Bonell et al. discuss the challenges of carrying out randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate...
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as faili...
Randomized trials of complex public health interventions generally aim to identify what works, accre...
Randomized trials of complex public health interventions generally aim to identify what works, accre...
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as fail...
Medical Research Council guidelines recognise the need to optimise complex interventions prior to fu...
Conventional approaches to evidence that prioritise randomised controlled trials appear increasingly...
Evidence-based policy is a dominant theme in contemporary public services but the practical realitie...
The author is currently conducting two rapid Realist Syntheses, one to identify the theoretical base...
Realist evaluation, a theory-driven approach to program evaluation grounded in realist philosophy, i...
Realist reviews offer a method to understand why an intervention is successful or not. Many factors ...
Background: The realist approach is a form of theory-driven evaluation developed to strengthen the e...
In this paper, we respond to a paper by Jamal and colleagues published in Trials in October 2015 and...
Realist evaluation asks ‘how and why do interventions work or not work, for whom, and in what circum...
Randomized trials of complex public health interventions generally aim to identify what works, accre...
Bonell et al. discuss the challenges of carrying out randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate...
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as faili...
Randomized trials of complex public health interventions generally aim to identify what works, accre...
Randomized trials of complex public health interventions generally aim to identify what works, accre...
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as fail...
Medical Research Council guidelines recognise the need to optimise complex interventions prior to fu...
Conventional approaches to evidence that prioritise randomised controlled trials appear increasingly...
Evidence-based policy is a dominant theme in contemporary public services but the practical realitie...
The author is currently conducting two rapid Realist Syntheses, one to identify the theoretical base...
Realist evaluation, a theory-driven approach to program evaluation grounded in realist philosophy, i...
Realist reviews offer a method to understand why an intervention is successful or not. Many factors ...
Background: The realist approach is a form of theory-driven evaluation developed to strengthen the e...
In this paper, we respond to a paper by Jamal and colleagues published in Trials in October 2015 and...
Realist evaluation asks ‘how and why do interventions work or not work, for whom, and in what circum...