Biomarker-stratified clinical trials assess the biomarker signature of subjects and split them into subgroups so that treatment is of benefit to those who are likely to respond. Since multiple hypotheses are tested, it becomes important to control the type I error. Current methods control the false positive rate where one rejects the null hypothesis while in reality that was true. For two subgroups, the false positive rate is controlled across the two hypotheses as a Family Wise Error Rate (FWER) to an overall predetermined significance level
In clinical trials, there always is the possibility to use data-driven adaptation at the end of a st...
When conducting a statistical test one of the initial risks that must be considered is a Type I erro...
Recently, several study designs incorporating treatment effect assessment in biomarker‐based subpopu...
In Phase II oncology trials, targeted therapies are being constantly evaluated for their efficacy in...
Multi-arm trials are an efficient way of simultaneously testing several experimental treatments agai...
International audiencePurpose: When there is more than one potentially predictive biomarker for a ne...
Oncology indispensably leads us to personalized medicine, which allows an individual approach to be ...
Biomarker-guided clinical trial designs, which focus on testing the effectiveness of a biomarker-gui...
In multiple hypotheses testing, it is important to control the probability of rejecting true null ...
Multi-arm clinical trials assessing multiple experimental treatments against a shared control group ...
In this project, we compared different analysis methods following stratified permuted block design, ...
In multiple hypotheses testing, it is important to control the probability of rejecting true null ...
When many tests of signi cance are examined in a research investigation with procedures that limit ...
Multi-arm clinical trials assessing multiple experimental treatments against a shared control group ...
BACKGROUND: The multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) design described by Royston et al. [Stat Med. 2003;22(1...
In clinical trials, there always is the possibility to use data-driven adaptation at the end of a st...
When conducting a statistical test one of the initial risks that must be considered is a Type I erro...
Recently, several study designs incorporating treatment effect assessment in biomarker‐based subpopu...
In Phase II oncology trials, targeted therapies are being constantly evaluated for their efficacy in...
Multi-arm trials are an efficient way of simultaneously testing several experimental treatments agai...
International audiencePurpose: When there is more than one potentially predictive biomarker for a ne...
Oncology indispensably leads us to personalized medicine, which allows an individual approach to be ...
Biomarker-guided clinical trial designs, which focus on testing the effectiveness of a biomarker-gui...
In multiple hypotheses testing, it is important to control the probability of rejecting true null ...
Multi-arm clinical trials assessing multiple experimental treatments against a shared control group ...
In this project, we compared different analysis methods following stratified permuted block design, ...
In multiple hypotheses testing, it is important to control the probability of rejecting true null ...
When many tests of signi cance are examined in a research investigation with procedures that limit ...
Multi-arm clinical trials assessing multiple experimental treatments against a shared control group ...
BACKGROUND: The multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) design described by Royston et al. [Stat Med. 2003;22(1...
In clinical trials, there always is the possibility to use data-driven adaptation at the end of a st...
When conducting a statistical test one of the initial risks that must be considered is a Type I erro...
Recently, several study designs incorporating treatment effect assessment in biomarker‐based subpopu...