National governments use evidence selectively to argue that a successful policy intervention in one local area should be emulated in others ('evidence-based best practice'). However, the value of such evidence is always limited because there is: disagreement on the best way to gather evidence of policy success, uncertainty regarding the extent to which we can draw general conclusions from specific evidence, and local policymaker opposition to interventions not developed in local areas. How do governments respond to this dilemma? This article identifies the Scottish Government response: it supports three potentially contradictory ways to gather evidence and encourage emulatio
The EU referendum campaign and aftermath brought to the fore the ongoing debate about evidence and e...
There has been an enormous increase in interest in the use of evidence for public policymaking, but ...
There is extensive health and public health literature on the ‘evidence-policy gap’, exp...
National governments use evidence selectively to argue that a successful policy intervention in one ...
It is easy to show that the UK Government rarely conducts ‘evidence-based policymaking’, but not to ...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Recent political campaigns on both sides of the Atlantic have led some to argue that we live in the ...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Calls for evidence-based policy often fail to recognise the fundamentally political nature of policy...
Recent political campaigns on both sides of the Atlantic have led some to argue that we live in the ...
Recent political campaigns on both sides of the Atlantic have led some to argue that we live in the ...
In recent years, there has been a marked increase in interest in the use of evidence for public poli...
The EU referendum campaign and aftermath brought to the fore the ongoing debate about evidence and e...
There has been an enormous increase in interest in the use of evidence for public policymaking, but ...
There is extensive health and public health literature on the ‘evidence-policy gap’, exp...
National governments use evidence selectively to argue that a successful policy intervention in one ...
It is easy to show that the UK Government rarely conducts ‘evidence-based policymaking’, but not to ...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Recent political campaigns on both sides of the Atlantic have led some to argue that we live in the ...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Ministers are always calling for more evidence-based interventions. Do they apply the same criterion...
Calls for evidence-based policy often fail to recognise the fundamentally political nature of policy...
Recent political campaigns on both sides of the Atlantic have led some to argue that we live in the ...
Recent political campaigns on both sides of the Atlantic have led some to argue that we live in the ...
In recent years, there has been a marked increase in interest in the use of evidence for public poli...
The EU referendum campaign and aftermath brought to the fore the ongoing debate about evidence and e...
There has been an enormous increase in interest in the use of evidence for public policymaking, but ...
There is extensive health and public health literature on the ‘evidence-policy gap’, exp...