The aim of this article is to consider the effects of hindsight bias on findings of negligence in medico-legal litigation and of the potential of the original Bolam direction to eliminate bias from the decision making process. The Bolam test may have been expanded beyond its appropriate scope in the past but these excesses have now largely been undone. It will be shown that Bolam still has an important role to play in tort cases. By considering breach of duty cases in which the Bolitho “gloss” has been applied attention is drawn to the potential dangers of disregarding practices within the medical profession
The courts are continuing to allow greater participation in the justice system by experts. Expert e...
In their recent Arizona Law Review article entitled What Juries Can\u27t Do Well: The Jury\u27s Perf...
In the context of medical advice to patients, the UK decision in Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Bo...
Cognitive psychologists know that judgments made in hindsight are distorted by two cognitive heurist...
The application of the Bolam test to cases of medical negligence has been the subject of prolonged c...
The application of the Bolam test to cases of medical negligence has been the subject of prolonged c...
Cognitive psychologists know that judgments made in hindsight are distorted by two cognitive heurist...
The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking a...
Participants in three conditions (foresight, hindsight, and a modified hindsight condition designed ...
The focus of this article is the medical profession and the application in Australia of the Bolam te...
The Bolam test was the standard by which medical negligence cases were judged. However, recently, th...
Participants in three conditions (foresight, hindsight, and a modified hindsight condition designed ...
The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking a...
The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking a...
The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking a...
The courts are continuing to allow greater participation in the justice system by experts. Expert e...
In their recent Arizona Law Review article entitled What Juries Can\u27t Do Well: The Jury\u27s Perf...
In the context of medical advice to patients, the UK decision in Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Bo...
Cognitive psychologists know that judgments made in hindsight are distorted by two cognitive heurist...
The application of the Bolam test to cases of medical negligence has been the subject of prolonged c...
The application of the Bolam test to cases of medical negligence has been the subject of prolonged c...
Cognitive psychologists know that judgments made in hindsight are distorted by two cognitive heurist...
The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking a...
Participants in three conditions (foresight, hindsight, and a modified hindsight condition designed ...
The focus of this article is the medical profession and the application in Australia of the Bolam te...
The Bolam test was the standard by which medical negligence cases were judged. However, recently, th...
Participants in three conditions (foresight, hindsight, and a modified hindsight condition designed ...
The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking a...
The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking a...
The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking a...
The courts are continuing to allow greater participation in the justice system by experts. Expert e...
In their recent Arizona Law Review article entitled What Juries Can\u27t Do Well: The Jury\u27s Perf...
In the context of medical advice to patients, the UK decision in Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Bo...