Add to ORKGDefendants were charged with violation of the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act because of failure to register as lobbyists under provisions of section 308 and to report expenditures as directed by section 305. The lower court found these sections of the statute unconstitutional and dismissed the information. On appeal, held, the act is not so vague and indefinite as to violate the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment; nor does it violate the First Amendment. The penalty provision of section 310(b) is not objectionable as a deprivation of First Amendment rights since it is separable. United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 74 S.Ct. 808 (1954)
The defendant was indicted for a felony on charges of wilfully attempting to evade or defeat\u27\u2...
Several members of the New Orleans Board of Commissioners of Elections were indicted on charges of h...
Respondents, three employees of the federal government, were, among other federal officeholders, acc...
Defendants were charged with violation of the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act because of failure ...
The C.I.O., with the consent of its president, Philip Murray, made expenditures from the funds of th...
Defendant was charged under a federal statute\u27 with the publication and distribution of a pamphle...
Defendant, an alien, against whom an order of deportation had been entered in 1930 by reason of his ...
The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by section 301(f) prohibits a factory operator from refusing to per...
The administrator of the Office of Price Administration brought an action in a federal district cour...
The Revenue Act of 1951 levied a tax on persons engaged in the business of accepting wagers, requiri...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that Act 64, Vermont\u27s campaign finance law, was in c...
Plaintiff brought a derivative suit against the defendant, a Delaware corporation, in a United State...
The Supreme Court has repeatedly noted that ballot and election regulations raise difficult question...
Lobbyists currently are required to register and report to the United States Congress under the Fede...
Until it was declared unconstitutional by the Washington Supreme Court in Bare v. Gorton, Section 1...
The defendant was indicted for a felony on charges of wilfully attempting to evade or defeat\u27\u2...
Several members of the New Orleans Board of Commissioners of Elections were indicted on charges of h...
Respondents, three employees of the federal government, were, among other federal officeholders, acc...
Defendants were charged with violation of the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act because of failure ...
The C.I.O., with the consent of its president, Philip Murray, made expenditures from the funds of th...
Defendant was charged under a federal statute\u27 with the publication and distribution of a pamphle...
Defendant, an alien, against whom an order of deportation had been entered in 1930 by reason of his ...
The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by section 301(f) prohibits a factory operator from refusing to per...
The administrator of the Office of Price Administration brought an action in a federal district cour...
The Revenue Act of 1951 levied a tax on persons engaged in the business of accepting wagers, requiri...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that Act 64, Vermont\u27s campaign finance law, was in c...
Plaintiff brought a derivative suit against the defendant, a Delaware corporation, in a United State...
The Supreme Court has repeatedly noted that ballot and election regulations raise difficult question...
Lobbyists currently are required to register and report to the United States Congress under the Fede...
Until it was declared unconstitutional by the Washington Supreme Court in Bare v. Gorton, Section 1...
The defendant was indicted for a felony on charges of wilfully attempting to evade or defeat\u27\u2...
Several members of the New Orleans Board of Commissioners of Elections were indicted on charges of h...
Respondents, three employees of the federal government, were, among other federal officeholders, acc...