This article describes a method for estimating the air supply rate required in non-unidirectional airflow cleanrooms to obtain a required concentration of airborne particles and microbe-carrying particles. The variables considered are: surface deposition, emission rates of airborne contamination from personnel and machinery, filter removal efficiency, effectiveness of cleanroom garments, effectiveness of air supply distribution, and the contribution of filtered air from clean air devices. Consideration is also given to the variability of airborne contamination in cleanrooms, and the air supply rate required to ensure that the required airborne concentration will be rarely exceeded
The degree of risk from microbial contamination of manufactured products by sources of contaminatio...
The removal efficiency of high efficiency air filters was determined against microbe-carrying partic...
The deposition velocity of airborne microbe-carrying particles (MCPs) falling towards surfaces was ...
Equations have been recently derived by Whyte, Lenegan and Eaton for calculating the airborne conce...
This article reviews a series of scientific articles written by the authors, where the following top...
Equations are derived in this paper for predicting the airborne concentration of particles and micr...
This is the third and final article in a series that discusses the deposition of airborne particles ...
This article reports an investigation into the ability of the air supply in non-unidirectional clean...
The European Union Guidelines to Good Manufacturing Practice (EU GGMP) includes a recommendation for...
This article is the second of a series that discusses the deposition of airborne particles onto clea...
An important facet of designing cleanrooms is the prediction of the volume of air necessary to achie...
Non-unidirectional airflow cleanrooms are supplied with filtered air to minimise the contamination ...
This article is the second of a three-part series that investigates the application of the ventila...
This article is the fourth of a short series of extracts from Bill Whyte’s new book Cleanroom Testin...
The removal of macroparticles (particles ≥5μm) and microbe-carrying particles (MCPs) from cleanroom ...
The degree of risk from microbial contamination of manufactured products by sources of contaminatio...
The removal efficiency of high efficiency air filters was determined against microbe-carrying partic...
The deposition velocity of airborne microbe-carrying particles (MCPs) falling towards surfaces was ...
Equations have been recently derived by Whyte, Lenegan and Eaton for calculating the airborne conce...
This article reviews a series of scientific articles written by the authors, where the following top...
Equations are derived in this paper for predicting the airborne concentration of particles and micr...
This is the third and final article in a series that discusses the deposition of airborne particles ...
This article reports an investigation into the ability of the air supply in non-unidirectional clean...
The European Union Guidelines to Good Manufacturing Practice (EU GGMP) includes a recommendation for...
This article is the second of a series that discusses the deposition of airborne particles onto clea...
An important facet of designing cleanrooms is the prediction of the volume of air necessary to achie...
Non-unidirectional airflow cleanrooms are supplied with filtered air to minimise the contamination ...
This article is the second of a three-part series that investigates the application of the ventila...
This article is the fourth of a short series of extracts from Bill Whyte’s new book Cleanroom Testin...
The removal of macroparticles (particles ≥5μm) and microbe-carrying particles (MCPs) from cleanroom ...
The degree of risk from microbial contamination of manufactured products by sources of contaminatio...
The removal efficiency of high efficiency air filters was determined against microbe-carrying partic...
The deposition velocity of airborne microbe-carrying particles (MCPs) falling towards surfaces was ...