This paper outlines the ways in which the United Kingdom manages civil litigation concerning sensitive national security material. These are: the common law of public interest immunity; the use of closed material procedure and special advocates; and the secret hearings of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. With these existing alternatives in mind the paper analyses the background to, the reasons for, and the controversies associated with the Justice and Security Act 2013, enacted in the wake of the UK Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Al Rawi v Security Service
This thesis explores issues of procedural fairness across the major statutory counterterrorism powe...
The need to combat terrorism has resulted in a need for changes to the legal process to take account...
The ‘War on Terror’ poses great challenges to democracies. The need for appropriate counter-terroris...
This article focuses on the ways in which English law struggles to accommodate security concerns wit...
The Justice and Security Act of 2013 provides for closed hearings in civil cases involving security ...
Closed material proceedings operating under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (UK) exclude non-Gover...
The use of closed material proceedings (CMPs), has proliferated since they were first introduced as ...
Closed material proceedings operating under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (UK) exclude non-Gover...
Closed material proceedings operating under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (UK) exclude non-Gover...
At the request of the LIBE committee, this study provides a comparative analysis of the national leg...
This article assesses the role of security detention within the context of a number of the United Ki...
This paper examines the UK\u27s approach to balancing counter-terror laws with human rights and civi...
This article assesses the role of security detention within the context of a number of the United Ki...
This article argues that the courts, not the Home Secretary, should be empowered to issue Terrorism ...
Closed material procedures were originally introduced in the UK to enable courts to hear national se...
This thesis explores issues of procedural fairness across the major statutory counterterrorism powe...
The need to combat terrorism has resulted in a need for changes to the legal process to take account...
The ‘War on Terror’ poses great challenges to democracies. The need for appropriate counter-terroris...
This article focuses on the ways in which English law struggles to accommodate security concerns wit...
The Justice and Security Act of 2013 provides for closed hearings in civil cases involving security ...
Closed material proceedings operating under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (UK) exclude non-Gover...
The use of closed material proceedings (CMPs), has proliferated since they were first introduced as ...
Closed material proceedings operating under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (UK) exclude non-Gover...
Closed material proceedings operating under the Justice and Security Act 2013 (UK) exclude non-Gover...
At the request of the LIBE committee, this study provides a comparative analysis of the national leg...
This article assesses the role of security detention within the context of a number of the United Ki...
This paper examines the UK\u27s approach to balancing counter-terror laws with human rights and civi...
This article assesses the role of security detention within the context of a number of the United Ki...
This article argues that the courts, not the Home Secretary, should be empowered to issue Terrorism ...
Closed material procedures were originally introduced in the UK to enable courts to hear national se...
This thesis explores issues of procedural fairness across the major statutory counterterrorism powe...
The need to combat terrorism has resulted in a need for changes to the legal process to take account...
The ‘War on Terror’ poses great challenges to democracies. The need for appropriate counter-terroris...