In Moohan v Lord Advocate the United Kingdom Supreme Court has, in the context of a case challenging the exclusion of convicted prisoners from voting in the Scottish Independence Referendum, confirmed the orthodox view that Article 3 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights does not guarantee rights of participation beyond voting for membership of an established legislature and, specifically, does not extend to voting in referendums. Two strong dissents in the case recognise the democratic weakness of this position and argue that the Strasbourg position is not as absolute as it may seem and that article 3 can properly be interpreted to include referendums in its scope, particularly those which relate to the right of ...
This article examines the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in RMT v United Kingdom1 on the c...
Embargo periods 2 gadi, kopš 08.05.2020.The right to participate in the governing of state is one of...
The European Court of Human Rights held in Austin Others v The United Kingdom that the police confi...
Comments on the constitutional issues raised by decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Hi...
In some respects the Brexit referendum itself was a violation of human rights, argues Adrian Low. Th...
In October 2012, the British and Scottish governments formed an historic agreement for the holding o...
On November 23, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered its judgment on whether the ...
The right to vote is not part of the main text of the European Convention of Human Rights enacted in...
The September 2014 Scottish independence referendum was an event of profound constitutional and poli...
In the dispute between Strasbourg and Westminster over prisoners’ voting rights, the arguments of bo...
Record numbers of voters have registered to take part in the Scottish independence referendum this m...
This article offers an internal critique of the European Court of Human Rights’ deferential approach...
This article analyses cases in which regional citizenship is an essential part of constitutional arc...
New archival evidence reveals how UK governments, since the 1970s, have been concerned primarily wit...
The September 2014 Scottish independence referendum was an event of profound constitutional and poli...
This article examines the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in RMT v United Kingdom1 on the c...
Embargo periods 2 gadi, kopš 08.05.2020.The right to participate in the governing of state is one of...
The European Court of Human Rights held in Austin Others v The United Kingdom that the police confi...
Comments on the constitutional issues raised by decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Hi...
In some respects the Brexit referendum itself was a violation of human rights, argues Adrian Low. Th...
In October 2012, the British and Scottish governments formed an historic agreement for the holding o...
On November 23, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered its judgment on whether the ...
The right to vote is not part of the main text of the European Convention of Human Rights enacted in...
The September 2014 Scottish independence referendum was an event of profound constitutional and poli...
In the dispute between Strasbourg and Westminster over prisoners’ voting rights, the arguments of bo...
Record numbers of voters have registered to take part in the Scottish independence referendum this m...
This article offers an internal critique of the European Court of Human Rights’ deferential approach...
This article analyses cases in which regional citizenship is an essential part of constitutional arc...
New archival evidence reveals how UK governments, since the 1970s, have been concerned primarily wit...
The September 2014 Scottish independence referendum was an event of profound constitutional and poli...
This article examines the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in RMT v United Kingdom1 on the c...
Embargo periods 2 gadi, kopš 08.05.2020.The right to participate in the governing of state is one of...
The European Court of Human Rights held in Austin Others v The United Kingdom that the police confi...