Researchers have frequently complained that the NHS ethical review system stifles good research. At last measures are being put in place to address this criticism, but will they undermine the protection of research participants? The Declaration of Helsinki recognizes that medicine will not progress without good quality research, but also demands that the well-being of research participants takes precedence over the interests of science and society. This article examines the implications of the ongoing reform of the NHS research ethics review system for researchers, ethics committees and research participants
Issue addressed: Most academic journals that publish studies involving human participants require ev...
BACKGROUND: Authors are required to describe in their manuscripts ethical approval from an appropria...
Meaningful progress of medicine depends on research that must ultimately involve human subjects. Obt...
This paper examines the UK’s response to a recent European Clinical Trials Directive, namely the Dep...
There is an international consensus that medical research involving humans should only be undertaken...
The UK Clinical Trials Regulations were amended in 2006 and 2008 to facilitate research on medicinal...
National Health Service research ethics committees exist to ensure that research performed within th...
The function of local research ethics committees is to consider the ethics of research proposals usi...
Aims. The authors aim to challenge accepted views about the dissemination of ethically acceptable re...
The history of health research, and concerns about the protection of human participants, dates back ...
In a recent issue of Journal of Medical Ethics (JME), we discussed the ethical review of evaluations...
Meaningful progress of medicine depends on research that must ultimately involve human subjects. Obt...
Background: Since the Helsinki Declaration was introduced in 1964 as a code of practice for clinical...
The role of research ethics committees has expanded across the UK and North America and the process ...
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent to which authors of cluster randomised trials adhered to two b...
Issue addressed: Most academic journals that publish studies involving human participants require ev...
BACKGROUND: Authors are required to describe in their manuscripts ethical approval from an appropria...
Meaningful progress of medicine depends on research that must ultimately involve human subjects. Obt...
This paper examines the UK’s response to a recent European Clinical Trials Directive, namely the Dep...
There is an international consensus that medical research involving humans should only be undertaken...
The UK Clinical Trials Regulations were amended in 2006 and 2008 to facilitate research on medicinal...
National Health Service research ethics committees exist to ensure that research performed within th...
The function of local research ethics committees is to consider the ethics of research proposals usi...
Aims. The authors aim to challenge accepted views about the dissemination of ethically acceptable re...
The history of health research, and concerns about the protection of human participants, dates back ...
In a recent issue of Journal of Medical Ethics (JME), we discussed the ethical review of evaluations...
Meaningful progress of medicine depends on research that must ultimately involve human subjects. Obt...
Background: Since the Helsinki Declaration was introduced in 1964 as a code of practice for clinical...
The role of research ethics committees has expanded across the UK and North America and the process ...
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent to which authors of cluster randomised trials adhered to two b...
Issue addressed: Most academic journals that publish studies involving human participants require ev...
BACKGROUND: Authors are required to describe in their manuscripts ethical approval from an appropria...
Meaningful progress of medicine depends on research that must ultimately involve human subjects. Obt...