In R (Axon) v Secretary of State for Health the Gillick competence test was confirmed. Commitment to childhood autonomy and privacy rights caused renewed academic criticism of the 'refusal' cases. This paper considers the form any changes to the law may take, and the potential consequences for the rights of parents and young people. Silber J.'s contention that parental Article 8 rights cease when the child makes a competent decision is potentially problematic if applied to refusal cases, especially in the context of the distinction between competence to consent to treatment and to the disclosure of information
Introducing Autonomy, Consent and the Law,1 Sheila McLean remarks that if the law is ‘to facilitate ...
Currently in England and Wales the law considers that all children below 10 years of age are exempt ...
Affirming the doctrine of informed consent, the UK Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB bela...
The landmark decision of Gillick v West Norfolk Area Health Authority was a victory for advocates of...
This article explores the relationship between competence and authority in relation to medical treat...
In the Gillick case the lower court decision was challenged by the mother of a child below the age o...
Draft regulatory guidance suggests that if the processing of a child's personal data begins with the...
In 2015 the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board handed down a landmark decision o...
AbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstract (Word Count: 298)(Word Count: 298)(...
Draft regulatory guidance suggests that if the processing of a child's personal data begins with the...
In this first article of two, the author considers some of the legal issues surrounding the matter o...
This article traces how the rise of respect for children’s consent during the 1980s has fallen durin...
Draft regulatory guidance suggests that if the processing of a child’s personal data begins with the...
F (Mother) v F (Father) concerned a dispute between parents as to whether or not their 15 and 11 yea...
This paper briefly reviews highlights from decades of debates in medicine, law, bioethics, psycholog...
Introducing Autonomy, Consent and the Law,1 Sheila McLean remarks that if the law is ‘to facilitate ...
Currently in England and Wales the law considers that all children below 10 years of age are exempt ...
Affirming the doctrine of informed consent, the UK Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB bela...
The landmark decision of Gillick v West Norfolk Area Health Authority was a victory for advocates of...
This article explores the relationship between competence and authority in relation to medical treat...
In the Gillick case the lower court decision was challenged by the mother of a child below the age o...
Draft regulatory guidance suggests that if the processing of a child's personal data begins with the...
In 2015 the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board handed down a landmark decision o...
AbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstract (Word Count: 298)(Word Count: 298)(...
Draft regulatory guidance suggests that if the processing of a child's personal data begins with the...
In this first article of two, the author considers some of the legal issues surrounding the matter o...
This article traces how the rise of respect for children’s consent during the 1980s has fallen durin...
Draft regulatory guidance suggests that if the processing of a child’s personal data begins with the...
F (Mother) v F (Father) concerned a dispute between parents as to whether or not their 15 and 11 yea...
This paper briefly reviews highlights from decades of debates in medicine, law, bioethics, psycholog...
Introducing Autonomy, Consent and the Law,1 Sheila McLean remarks that if the law is ‘to facilitate ...
Currently in England and Wales the law considers that all children below 10 years of age are exempt ...
Affirming the doctrine of informed consent, the UK Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB bela...