There are many barriers to using science to inform conservation policy and practice. Conservation scientists wishing to produce management-relevant science must balance this goal with the imperative of demonstrating novelty and rigor in their science. Decision makers seeking to make evidence-based decisions must balance a desire for knowledge with the need to act despite uncertainty. Generating science that will effectively inform management decisions requires that the production of information (the components of knowledge) be salient (relevant and timely), credible (authoritative, believable, and trusted), and legitimate (developed via a process that considers the values and perspectives of all relevant actors) in the eyes of both research...
It is widely accepted that there is a considerable gap between the science of conservation biology a...
Improving the use of scientific evidence in conservation policy has been a long-standing focus of th...
Drawing on the “evidence-based” (Sutherland et al. 2013) versus “evidence-informed” debate (Adams & ...
There are many barriers to using science to inform conservation policy and practice. Conservation sc...
There are many barriers to using science to inform conservation policy and practice. Conservation sc...
We agree with Laurance et al. (2012) that conservation can gain when scientists and practitioners sh...
Drawing on the "evidence-based" (Sutherland et al. 2013) versus "evidence-informed" debate (Adams & ...
Although protected areas represent a pivotal response to escalating anthropogenic threats, they face...
Effective conservation management is underpinned by science. Yet, there are often barriers against t...
Conservation science and conservation action are assumed to have identical goals. However, in realit...
Conservation scientists and practitioners share many of the same goals. Yet in a majority of cases, ...
Abstract The knowledge-action gap in conservation science and practice occurs when research outputs ...
Biodiversity is being lost at alarming rates in spite of efforts to conserve ecosystems, species and...
This chapter offers advice on how the conservation science community can effectively engage with dec...
There is a vigorous debate about the capacity of conservation biology, as a scientific discipline, t...
It is widely accepted that there is a considerable gap between the science of conservation biology a...
Improving the use of scientific evidence in conservation policy has been a long-standing focus of th...
Drawing on the “evidence-based” (Sutherland et al. 2013) versus “evidence-informed” debate (Adams & ...
There are many barriers to using science to inform conservation policy and practice. Conservation sc...
There are many barriers to using science to inform conservation policy and practice. Conservation sc...
We agree with Laurance et al. (2012) that conservation can gain when scientists and practitioners sh...
Drawing on the "evidence-based" (Sutherland et al. 2013) versus "evidence-informed" debate (Adams & ...
Although protected areas represent a pivotal response to escalating anthropogenic threats, they face...
Effective conservation management is underpinned by science. Yet, there are often barriers against t...
Conservation science and conservation action are assumed to have identical goals. However, in realit...
Conservation scientists and practitioners share many of the same goals. Yet in a majority of cases, ...
Abstract The knowledge-action gap in conservation science and practice occurs when research outputs ...
Biodiversity is being lost at alarming rates in spite of efforts to conserve ecosystems, species and...
This chapter offers advice on how the conservation science community can effectively engage with dec...
There is a vigorous debate about the capacity of conservation biology, as a scientific discipline, t...
It is widely accepted that there is a considerable gap between the science of conservation biology a...
Improving the use of scientific evidence in conservation policy has been a long-standing focus of th...
Drawing on the “evidence-based” (Sutherland et al. 2013) versus “evidence-informed” debate (Adams & ...