Add to ORKGNRS 432B.6075 governs emergency admission of children with emotional disturbances to facilities for their protection, and requires a petition for continuance of admission after an emergency admission within five days of the involuntary placement.[1] Based on N.R.C.P. 6(a), which governs the computing of time for judicial purposes, the Court held that the five day limitation on filing a petition was based on judicial, not calendar, days. The Court granted the State’s petition for a writ of mandamus, directing the district court to vacate its order denying the State’s NRS 432B petition
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Nevada Supreme Court considered a case in which several...
The Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the standard for substituting an expert witness after the clos...
NuVeda challenged the district court’s decision to deny the motion to transfer the contempt hearing ...
NRS 432B.6075 governs emergency admission of children with emotional disturbances to facilities for ...
Under NRS 433A.310(1)(b), a district court may issue an order of involuntary admittance to a mental ...
Under NRS 612.530(1), parties have 11 days after the NESD Board of Review\u27s decision is finalized...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered this writ of mandamus as it held substantial precedential value ...
The Supreme Court denied petitioners’ application for a writ of mandamus for abuse of the district c...
As a matter of first impression, the Court found that the 45-day service requirement for review of a...
Under NRS 22.030, for a district court to have jurisdiction to hold a party in indirect contempt, th...
The Court considered whether Assembly Bill 579, which required mandatory registration for juveniles ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Court considered a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging an order from the district court ...
The Court overruled Barto v. Weishaar, partly granted the petitioner’s writ of mandamus, and held th...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Nevada Supreme Court considered a case in which several...
The Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the standard for substituting an expert witness after the clos...
NuVeda challenged the district court’s decision to deny the motion to transfer the contempt hearing ...
NRS 432B.6075 governs emergency admission of children with emotional disturbances to facilities for ...
Under NRS 433A.310(1)(b), a district court may issue an order of involuntary admittance to a mental ...
Under NRS 612.530(1), parties have 11 days after the NESD Board of Review\u27s decision is finalized...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered this writ of mandamus as it held substantial precedential value ...
The Supreme Court denied petitioners’ application for a writ of mandamus for abuse of the district c...
As a matter of first impression, the Court found that the 45-day service requirement for review of a...
Under NRS 22.030, for a district court to have jurisdiction to hold a party in indirect contempt, th...
The Court considered whether Assembly Bill 579, which required mandatory registration for juveniles ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Court considered a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging an order from the district court ...
The Court overruled Barto v. Weishaar, partly granted the petitioner’s writ of mandamus, and held th...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Nevada Supreme Court considered a case in which several...
The Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the standard for substituting an expert witness after the clos...
NuVeda challenged the district court’s decision to deny the motion to transfer the contempt hearing ...