Economics has devoted little attention so far as to whether the type of decision maker matters for economic decisions. However, many important decisions like those on monetary policy or a company's business strategy are made by (small) groups rather than an individual. We compare behaviour of individuals and small groups in an experimental beauty-contest game. Our findings suggest that groups are not smarter decision makers per se, but that they learn faster than individuals. When individuals compete against groups, the latter significantly outperform the former in terms of payoff
Many experiments comparing individual and group behavior find that groups behave more egoistically t...
Based on an experiment in Japan in 2008, this paper explores a new dimension of thinking. This paper...
This paper reports an experiment that examines whether groups can make better decisions than individ...
Even though decision-making in small teams is pervasive in business and in private life, little is k...
Groups make decisions more rational than individuals do. This may depend by several factors. The lea...
In games of social learning individuals tend to give too much weight to their own private informatio...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...
We examine the influence of team size on decision making in a beauty-contest experiment. Teams with ...
Both mainstream economics and its critics have focused on models of individual rational agents. But ...
In many important public good situations the decision-making power and authority is delegated to rep...
Two experiments compared the Centipede game played either by 2 individuals or by 2 (3-person) groups...
Many decisions are interactive; the outcome of one party depends not only on its decisions or on act...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
Most studies that compare individual and group behavior neglect the in-group decision making process...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
Many experiments comparing individual and group behavior find that groups behave more egoistically t...
Based on an experiment in Japan in 2008, this paper explores a new dimension of thinking. This paper...
This paper reports an experiment that examines whether groups can make better decisions than individ...
Even though decision-making in small teams is pervasive in business and in private life, little is k...
Groups make decisions more rational than individuals do. This may depend by several factors. The lea...
In games of social learning individuals tend to give too much weight to their own private informatio...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...
We examine the influence of team size on decision making in a beauty-contest experiment. Teams with ...
Both mainstream economics and its critics have focused on models of individual rational agents. But ...
In many important public good situations the decision-making power and authority is delegated to rep...
Two experiments compared the Centipede game played either by 2 individuals or by 2 (3-person) groups...
Many decisions are interactive; the outcome of one party depends not only on its decisions or on act...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
Most studies that compare individual and group behavior neglect the in-group decision making process...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
Many experiments comparing individual and group behavior find that groups behave more egoistically t...
Based on an experiment in Japan in 2008, this paper explores a new dimension of thinking. This paper...
This paper reports an experiment that examines whether groups can make better decisions than individ...