C. V. James and his wife and children owned certain property as tenants in common. In 1931 defendant Fallon recovered a judgment against C. V. James, and the land was sold by a sheriff under execution. Fallon became the purchaser at the sheriff\u27s sale and was issued a sheriff\u27s deed purporting to convey the entire interest in the property. Thereafter he was in the actual, visible, distant, hostile, exclusive, continuous and uninterrupted possession of the land and paid all taxes thereon. Plaintiffs, the wife and children of James, brought this action to determine the ownership of the property. Fallon claimed title by adverse possession under an eighteen-year statute of limitations. The lower court held that the plaintiffs, as tenant...
Adverse Possession - Tenants in Common - Inception of Hostility - A father died leaving seven childr...
This article discusses a California case which held that a tenant in common’s exclusive use of prope...
At an execution sale to satisfy a judgment against her, plaintiff\u27s interest in certain lots whic...
C. V. James and his wife and children owned certain property as tenants in common. In 1931 defendant...
John and Maltie Preston moved onto a parcel of land in 1910 where they lived until 1950 when John di...
Plaintiff in an ejectment action claimed under a chain of title tracing back to a government patent....
From 1924 until 1948 plaintiff and her family were in apparent, open and continuous possession of a ...
Adverse Possession - Tenants in Common - Inception of Hostility - A father died leaving seven childr...
Plaintiff and defendant\u27s predecessor in title made a mistake in locating the boundary line betwe...
Plaintiff in an ejectment action claimed under a chain of title tracing back to a government patent....
The life tenant of the premises in controversy purported to convey a fee title to defendant in 1920 ...
Land purchased by the plaintiff\u27s husband in 1911 was surrounded by a fence which included the la...
The life tenant of the premises in controversy purported to convey a fee title to defendant in 1920 ...
The life tenant of the premises in controversy purported to convey a fee title to defendant in 1920 ...
The life tenant of the premises in controversy purported to convey a fee title to defendant in 1920 ...
Adverse Possession - Tenants in Common - Inception of Hostility - A father died leaving seven childr...
This article discusses a California case which held that a tenant in common’s exclusive use of prope...
At an execution sale to satisfy a judgment against her, plaintiff\u27s interest in certain lots whic...
C. V. James and his wife and children owned certain property as tenants in common. In 1931 defendant...
John and Maltie Preston moved onto a parcel of land in 1910 where they lived until 1950 when John di...
Plaintiff in an ejectment action claimed under a chain of title tracing back to a government patent....
From 1924 until 1948 plaintiff and her family were in apparent, open and continuous possession of a ...
Adverse Possession - Tenants in Common - Inception of Hostility - A father died leaving seven childr...
Plaintiff and defendant\u27s predecessor in title made a mistake in locating the boundary line betwe...
Plaintiff in an ejectment action claimed under a chain of title tracing back to a government patent....
The life tenant of the premises in controversy purported to convey a fee title to defendant in 1920 ...
Land purchased by the plaintiff\u27s husband in 1911 was surrounded by a fence which included the la...
The life tenant of the premises in controversy purported to convey a fee title to defendant in 1920 ...
The life tenant of the premises in controversy purported to convey a fee title to defendant in 1920 ...
The life tenant of the premises in controversy purported to convey a fee title to defendant in 1920 ...
Adverse Possession - Tenants in Common - Inception of Hostility - A father died leaving seven childr...
This article discusses a California case which held that a tenant in common’s exclusive use of prope...
At an execution sale to satisfy a judgment against her, plaintiff\u27s interest in certain lots whic...