Some philosophers defend legal punishment by appealing to a natural right to punish wrongdoers, a right people would have in a state of nature. Many of these philosophers argue that legal punishment can be justified by transferring this right to the state. I’ll argue that such a right may not be transferrable to the state because such a right may not survive the transition out of anarchy. A compelling reason for the natural right claim – that in a state of nature there are few if any viable non-punitive enforcement options – isn’t obviously true in state contexts
Justice is a natural virtue. Well-functioning humans are just, as are well-ordered human societies. ...
Natural law theory can render the so-called “non-aggression principle” (NAP), which prohibits the in...
Law professors nowadays mention natural law and natural rights on a regular basis, and not just in j...
Some philosophers defend legal punishment by appealing to a natural right to punish wrongdoers, a ri...
A man, carrying a gun in his waistband, robs a food vendor. In making his escape, the gun ...
The work deals with the law of the State to punish. The author seeks answers to her unspoken questio...
In Why Is It Wrong To Punish Thought? I defended an overlooked principle of criminalization that I c...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Natu- ralism-the notion...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Naturalism—the notion t...
ABSTRACT: One of the three fundamental institutions of the criminal law is the sanction. It represen...
This thesis argues that it is all-things-considered permissible for the state to punish citizens who...
Constitutional orders punish — and they punish abundantly. However, analysis of the constitutionalit...
Natural rights and natural -law are ideas that frequently seem to have something in common with the ...
In ‘Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content?’, Douglas Husak argues that an analysis of the justifia...
Some theorists argue that a justification of criminal punishment presupposes a theory of state power...
Justice is a natural virtue. Well-functioning humans are just, as are well-ordered human societies. ...
Natural law theory can render the so-called “non-aggression principle” (NAP), which prohibits the in...
Law professors nowadays mention natural law and natural rights on a regular basis, and not just in j...
Some philosophers defend legal punishment by appealing to a natural right to punish wrongdoers, a ri...
A man, carrying a gun in his waistband, robs a food vendor. In making his escape, the gun ...
The work deals with the law of the State to punish. The author seeks answers to her unspoken questio...
In Why Is It Wrong To Punish Thought? I defended an overlooked principle of criminalization that I c...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Natu- ralism-the notion...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Naturalism—the notion t...
ABSTRACT: One of the three fundamental institutions of the criminal law is the sanction. It represen...
This thesis argues that it is all-things-considered permissible for the state to punish citizens who...
Constitutional orders punish — and they punish abundantly. However, analysis of the constitutionalit...
Natural rights and natural -law are ideas that frequently seem to have something in common with the ...
In ‘Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content?’, Douglas Husak argues that an analysis of the justifia...
Some theorists argue that a justification of criminal punishment presupposes a theory of state power...
Justice is a natural virtue. Well-functioning humans are just, as are well-ordered human societies. ...
Natural law theory can render the so-called “non-aggression principle” (NAP), which prohibits the in...
Law professors nowadays mention natural law and natural rights on a regular basis, and not just in j...