(Excerpt) Two weeks ago, the UK Supreme Court issued an important ruling in a controversy American church-state lawyers will find familiar. In Lee v. Ashers Baking Company, the court ruled that a Belfast bakery did not violate British anti-discrimination laws when it declined, because of the owners’ Christian convictions, to fill a customer’s order for a cake promoting gay marriage. The British case strongly resembles—though not exactly—a case our own Supreme Court decided in May, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. But while the American court sidestepped difficult questions, the British court addressed them directly. The ruling thus offers a roadmap for how our own Supreme Court might decide a similar dispute in the ...
In May 2015, the NI County Court held that a bakery discriminated against a gay man by refusing to s...
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission took u...
In a case involving the balancing of public accommodation anti-discrimination laws and First Amendme...
(Excerpt) In the next few months, the Supreme Court will decide Masterpiece Cakeshop, one of a serie...
(Excerpt) At the close of its term last month, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Masterpiece C...
For the first Legal Spirits podcast, Center Director Mark Movsesian and Associate Director Marc DeGi...
As to the underlying issue of whether wedding cakes are something that the government can compel a b...
A critical examination of the reasoning of the Supreme Court's decision in Lee v Ashers Bakery, the ...
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, ma...
Last term, the Supreme Court decided Masterpiece Cakeshop, one of several recent cases in which reli...
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is the most important same-sex rights case ...
This paper considers how three jurisdictions, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom, have...
In Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission,[1] the U.S. Supreme Court ruled s...
On June 4, The Supreme Court announced its 7-2 ruling in favor of a baker who refused to bake a cake...
This Article focuses on the Lee v. Ashers Baking Company case from the Supreme Court of the United K...
In May 2015, the NI County Court held that a bakery discriminated against a gay man by refusing to s...
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission took u...
In a case involving the balancing of public accommodation anti-discrimination laws and First Amendme...
(Excerpt) In the next few months, the Supreme Court will decide Masterpiece Cakeshop, one of a serie...
(Excerpt) At the close of its term last month, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Masterpiece C...
For the first Legal Spirits podcast, Center Director Mark Movsesian and Associate Director Marc DeGi...
As to the underlying issue of whether wedding cakes are something that the government can compel a b...
A critical examination of the reasoning of the Supreme Court's decision in Lee v Ashers Bakery, the ...
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, ma...
Last term, the Supreme Court decided Masterpiece Cakeshop, one of several recent cases in which reli...
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is the most important same-sex rights case ...
This paper considers how three jurisdictions, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom, have...
In Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission,[1] the U.S. Supreme Court ruled s...
On June 4, The Supreme Court announced its 7-2 ruling in favor of a baker who refused to bake a cake...
This Article focuses on the Lee v. Ashers Baking Company case from the Supreme Court of the United K...
In May 2015, the NI County Court held that a bakery discriminated against a gay man by refusing to s...
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission took u...
In a case involving the balancing of public accommodation anti-discrimination laws and First Amendme...