International audienceIn the present study, we investigated the ability to assign moral responsibility and punishment in adults with high functioning autism or Asperger Syndrome (HFA/AS), using non-verbal cartoons depicting an aggression, an accidental harm or a mere coincidence. Participants were asked to evaluate the agent’s causal and intentional roles, his responsibility and the punishment he deserves for his action. Adults with HFA/AS did not differ in judgments of suffering and causality from adults with typical development. However, subtle difficulties with judgments of intentional action and moral judgments were observed in participants with HFA/AS. These results are discussed in the light of emerging studies that deal with integrit...
This paper adds to the growing research on moral judgment (MJ) by considering whether theory of mind...
This paper presents a challenge for exemplar theories of moral concepts. Some have proposed that we ...
Intentional harms are typically judged to be morally worse than accidental harms. Distinguishing bet...
The ability of a group of adults with high functioning autism (HFA) or Asperger Syndrome (AS) to dis...
Children with autism were compared with control groups on their ability to make moral judgements. Pa...
Deficits in communication are one of the main symptoms for individuals with autism, and studying the...
This study compared the theory of mind features of moral judgements in 60 children with and without ...
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. 1073/pnas....
Abstract Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) present difficulties in integrating mental ...
This study investigated moral judgment in children with high-functioning autism and their cooperatio...
Human social intelligence comprises a wide range of complex cognitive and affective processes that a...
This study examined how children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) judged social actions that inv...
This study investigated moral judgment in children with high-functioning autism and their cooperatio...
Item does not contain fulltextThe aims of the present study were to investigate relations between mo...
One’s own emotional response toward a hypothetical action can influence judgments of its moral accep...
This paper adds to the growing research on moral judgment (MJ) by considering whether theory of mind...
This paper presents a challenge for exemplar theories of moral concepts. Some have proposed that we ...
Intentional harms are typically judged to be morally worse than accidental harms. Distinguishing bet...
The ability of a group of adults with high functioning autism (HFA) or Asperger Syndrome (AS) to dis...
Children with autism were compared with control groups on their ability to make moral judgements. Pa...
Deficits in communication are one of the main symptoms for individuals with autism, and studying the...
This study compared the theory of mind features of moral judgements in 60 children with and without ...
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. 1073/pnas....
Abstract Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) present difficulties in integrating mental ...
This study investigated moral judgment in children with high-functioning autism and their cooperatio...
Human social intelligence comprises a wide range of complex cognitive and affective processes that a...
This study examined how children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) judged social actions that inv...
This study investigated moral judgment in children with high-functioning autism and their cooperatio...
Item does not contain fulltextThe aims of the present study were to investigate relations between mo...
One’s own emotional response toward a hypothetical action can influence judgments of its moral accep...
This paper adds to the growing research on moral judgment (MJ) by considering whether theory of mind...
This paper presents a challenge for exemplar theories of moral concepts. Some have proposed that we ...
Intentional harms are typically judged to be morally worse than accidental harms. Distinguishing bet...