Writing a text as a research action, dialogical, self-critically, open and collective, is not the most effective way to respond to the protocol forms instituted by the productivist logic of academic institutions. We take the risk into the mismatch, straining the conventional way of doing. The act responds to a radically contextualized logic processes where the artwork or the academic product are not determinant. Are determinant the individual and collective processes, affection and tempers. In particular the ways of doing. About the tradeoff posed between integrative models and communal alternative models, we propose not a model but a modes of looking, modes to exchange and understand the collectivization of our processes. One way to establ...