EVALUASI PROGRAM BEASISWA PENDIDIKAN KEDINASAN DI KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan evaluasi program beasiswa pendidikan kedinasan di Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. Penelitian menggunakan model evaluasi CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) dan evaluasi summative dengan metodologi kualitatif studi kasus. Penelitian dilakukan dengan melibatkan 51 partisipan yang terdiri dari alumni penerima beasiswa (30 orang), Koordinator program studi (6 orang), atasan alumni penerima beasiswa ( 9 orang), Kepala Seksi dan Kepala Bidang BPSDM Kementerian PUPR ( 5 orang) dan Kepala BSNP (1 orang). Teknik pengumpulan data kualitatif yang digunakan adalah wawancara, kuesioner , forum diskusi terpimpin dan analisis dokumen. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis data kualitatif Miles dan Hubermen (1994) dengan kategori berdasarkan aspek pada model CIPP yang selanjutnya dianalisis berdasarkan tema yang ditemukan dalam setiap aspek . Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pada aspek konteks (Context) yaitu latar belakang program untuk memenuhi kebutuhan tenaga professional, namun visi dan misi program tidak ditemui dalam dokumen program. Sedangkan pada Input perencanaan pendidikan kedinasan utamanya dalam perumusan tujuan tidak terinci dikaitkan dengan kebutuhan pengembangan SDM di Kementerian PUPR serta ketersediaan sumber daya yang ada. Juga tidak sesuai dengan UU No. 20/2003 dimana pendidikan kedinasan seharusnya dilakukan sebagai pendidikan profesi namun diselenggarakan sebagai pendidikan akademis dengan memperkaya materi pembelajaran yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan pekerjaan. Perumusan tujuan disarankan agar terukur, komprehensif dan strategis. Pelaksanaan program pembelajaran telah sesuai dengan perencanaan dengan capaian kompetensi yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan pekerjaan di lapangan. Hasil program telah berkontribusi dalam meningkatkan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di Kementerian PUPR. ********** The research aimed is to evaluate the scholarship program of the official educational scholarship program in the Ministry of Public Works and Housing of Indonesia (MPWHI). The research employed the evaluation model of CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) and the summative evaluation with a case study as a research methodology. The study involved 51 participants of scholarship alumni program (30 persons), the head department (6 persons), the manager of alumni (9 persons), the official of BPSDM (5 persons), and the head of BSNP (1 person). The data collection of interview, questioner of open-ended questions, focus group discussion, and document analysis were employed. Data analyzed used qualitative data analysis (Miles and Huberman, 1994) and were categorized based on the CIPP model's evaluation and followed by the elaboration of themes. The result showed that in the Context aspect, the program's background was designed to supply the professional employees' need. However, the vision and mission of the program were not elaborate in the document program. Then, in the Input aspect initially in designing the program's objectives, it revealed that these not planned detailed related to Human Resources Requirements and another resource available. The implementation is also different from Law No. 20/2003, where the professional education approach should implement official education. It applied used the academic educational method but enriched by the material needed to the job requirements. Designing the program objectives should detail, comprehensive and strategic. The Process aspect, especially the learning method, applied accordingly the designed and achieved the needed competencies. The Recommendation Model of Scholarship's for Human Resources Development promoted and consists of need analysis, program planning, implementation and assessment of result and benefits. The Product aspect, especially the study's competencies, has a significant contribution to enhancing the HRD within the MPWHI. Keywords: Program Evaluation, CIPP Model, The Official Scholarship, and The Competencies of Human Resources