U.S. agricultural subsidies are easy to criticize because they are far from uniformly distributed. Subsidies are concentrated geographically, they are concentrated on relatively few crops, and they are concentrated on relatively few producers. The accompanying three charts illustrate these three dimensions of concentration
Iowa Ag Review is a quarterly newsletter published by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Develop...
With government farm payments making up close to half of net farm income (and nearly 100 percent in ...
Cogent justifi cations for continuing subsidies to U.S. crop farmers are diffi cult to fi nd. Most a...
Are United States farm subsidies fair? Should they and can they be made more fair? Do farm subsidies...
One of the most striking consequences of the industrialization of agriculture in the United States i...
Iowa Ag Review is a quarterly newsletter published by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Develop...
The United States spends $20 billion each year on farm subsidies. Farmers face increased risk and in...
One of the legacies of the 1977 farm bill is that USDA is required to make an annual report to Congr...
The purpose of this study is to examine farms’ dependence on federal United States agricultural subs...
Each year the US federal government spends billions on farm subsidies, with policy makers often just...
This thesis pertains to agricultural subsidies, their economic and political implications and what w...
A previous article in the Iowa Ag Review (Fall 1999, Vol. 5, No. 4) pointed out that because subsidi...
Iowa Ag Review is a quarterly newsletter published by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Develop...
This article analyzes the dynamics effects of the farm subsidies in the United States. The subsidies...
This paper analyzes the dynamic effects of the acreage restrictions and land diversion requirements ...
Iowa Ag Review is a quarterly newsletter published by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Develop...
With government farm payments making up close to half of net farm income (and nearly 100 percent in ...
Cogent justifi cations for continuing subsidies to U.S. crop farmers are diffi cult to fi nd. Most a...
Are United States farm subsidies fair? Should they and can they be made more fair? Do farm subsidies...
One of the most striking consequences of the industrialization of agriculture in the United States i...
Iowa Ag Review is a quarterly newsletter published by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Develop...
The United States spends $20 billion each year on farm subsidies. Farmers face increased risk and in...
One of the legacies of the 1977 farm bill is that USDA is required to make an annual report to Congr...
The purpose of this study is to examine farms’ dependence on federal United States agricultural subs...
Each year the US federal government spends billions on farm subsidies, with policy makers often just...
This thesis pertains to agricultural subsidies, their economic and political implications and what w...
A previous article in the Iowa Ag Review (Fall 1999, Vol. 5, No. 4) pointed out that because subsidi...
Iowa Ag Review is a quarterly newsletter published by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Develop...
This article analyzes the dynamics effects of the farm subsidies in the United States. The subsidies...
This paper analyzes the dynamic effects of the acreage restrictions and land diversion requirements ...
Iowa Ag Review is a quarterly newsletter published by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Develop...
With government farm payments making up close to half of net farm income (and nearly 100 percent in ...
Cogent justifi cations for continuing subsidies to U.S. crop farmers are diffi cult to fi nd. Most a...