In August 2003, the United States and Australia asked the World Trade Organization (WTO) to convene a panel to resolve an ongoing dispute concerning geographical indications (GIs). In simple terms, the United States and Australia charged that E.U. rules governing the registration of GIs discriminate against third-country GI products (national treatment) and fail to protect U.S. trademarks. Given the range of sub-issues covered in the dispute, it is perhaps not surprising that the WTO panel’s March 2005 ruling left both sides claiming victory
What do Vidalia onions, Wisconsin cheese, and Kona coffee have that feta cheese, champagne, and cogn...
Over the recent past, Geographical Indication (GI) has emerged as one of the most contentious catego...
The ever expanding global marketplace and increasing sophistication of consumers has led to a height...
As worldwide consumer demand for high-quality products and for information about these products incr...
As worldwide consumer demand for high-quality products and for information about these products inc...
A Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) report reviewing the debates in the WTO on geograph...
This report discusses the issue of expanding intellectual property protections for geographical indi...
Since 1992, the European Union has protected high-quality agricultural products based on geographica...
The dispute "European Communities - Protection of trademarks and geographical indications for agricu...
It should not be surprising that the United States is not a major proponent of the protection of geo...
It should not be surprising that the United States is not a major proponent of the protection of geo...
Since 1992, the European Union has protected high-quality agricultural products based on geographica...
The relationship between trademarks and geographical indications ( GIs ) has historically been tempe...
The international community is currently deeply divided over the appropriate level of protection for...
European law and policies on geographical indications (GIs) have come into conflict with those of “N...
What do Vidalia onions, Wisconsin cheese, and Kona coffee have that feta cheese, champagne, and cogn...
Over the recent past, Geographical Indication (GI) has emerged as one of the most contentious catego...
The ever expanding global marketplace and increasing sophistication of consumers has led to a height...
As worldwide consumer demand for high-quality products and for information about these products incr...
As worldwide consumer demand for high-quality products and for information about these products inc...
A Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) report reviewing the debates in the WTO on geograph...
This report discusses the issue of expanding intellectual property protections for geographical indi...
Since 1992, the European Union has protected high-quality agricultural products based on geographica...
The dispute "European Communities - Protection of trademarks and geographical indications for agricu...
It should not be surprising that the United States is not a major proponent of the protection of geo...
It should not be surprising that the United States is not a major proponent of the protection of geo...
Since 1992, the European Union has protected high-quality agricultural products based on geographica...
The relationship between trademarks and geographical indications ( GIs ) has historically been tempe...
The international community is currently deeply divided over the appropriate level of protection for...
European law and policies on geographical indications (GIs) have come into conflict with those of “N...
What do Vidalia onions, Wisconsin cheese, and Kona coffee have that feta cheese, champagne, and cogn...
Over the recent past, Geographical Indication (GI) has emerged as one of the most contentious catego...
The ever expanding global marketplace and increasing sophistication of consumers has led to a height...