In this introduction, we underline the theoretical connection between responsibility, luck, and equality upon which luck egalitarianism rests, and we consider the social and political relevance of the approach. We then situate Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen’s version of the view as proposed in his book, Luck Egalitarianism, in the egalitarian landscape. Lastly, we introduce the six papers that make up this symposium: some are critiques from within or outside luck egalitarianism, while others engage with the theory by expanding the scope of luck egalitarianism.Political Philosophy and Ethic
The concept of responsibility plays a crucial part in the debate between proponents of democratic eq...
Lippert-Rasmussen has proposed a new version of luck egalitarianism: equality of concern. In this ar...
One of the main debates in left political philosophy is that between social and luck egalitarians. S...
In this introduction, we underline the theoretical connection between responsibility, luck, and equa...
Luck egalitarians argue that distributive justice should be understood in terms of our capacity to b...
Luck egalitarianism is a broad theory of justice that emphasises the importance of responsibility (t...
My thesis engages with the question about what it means to treat each other as equals, as this has b...
In his new book, Luck Egalitarianism, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen responds to challenges raised by soci...
Luck egalitarianism originated in an attempt to respond to the conservative objection that egalitari...
Luck egalitarianism - the theory that makes individual responsibility central to distributive justic...
Egalitarians claim that inequality in society is only justified to the extent that it results from c...
The family of theories dubbed ‘luck egalitarianism’ represent an attempt to infuse egalitarian think...
A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair –...
In the last four decades, luck egalitarianism has emerged as a hotly debated theory of distributive ...
Some luck egalitarians argue that justice is just one value among others and is thus not necessarily...
The concept of responsibility plays a crucial part in the debate between proponents of democratic eq...
Lippert-Rasmussen has proposed a new version of luck egalitarianism: equality of concern. In this ar...
One of the main debates in left political philosophy is that between social and luck egalitarians. S...
In this introduction, we underline the theoretical connection between responsibility, luck, and equa...
Luck egalitarians argue that distributive justice should be understood in terms of our capacity to b...
Luck egalitarianism is a broad theory of justice that emphasises the importance of responsibility (t...
My thesis engages with the question about what it means to treat each other as equals, as this has b...
In his new book, Luck Egalitarianism, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen responds to challenges raised by soci...
Luck egalitarianism originated in an attempt to respond to the conservative objection that egalitari...
Luck egalitarianism - the theory that makes individual responsibility central to distributive justic...
Egalitarians claim that inequality in society is only justified to the extent that it results from c...
The family of theories dubbed ‘luck egalitarianism’ represent an attempt to infuse egalitarian think...
A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair –...
In the last four decades, luck egalitarianism has emerged as a hotly debated theory of distributive ...
Some luck egalitarians argue that justice is just one value among others and is thus not necessarily...
The concept of responsibility plays a crucial part in the debate between proponents of democratic eq...
Lippert-Rasmussen has proposed a new version of luck egalitarianism: equality of concern. In this ar...
One of the main debates in left political philosophy is that between social and luck egalitarians. S...