BACKGROUND This review is the latest in a series of regular annual reviews undertaken by the editors and aims to highlight some of the key papers published in Resuscitation during 2020. The number of papers submitted to the Journal in 2020 increased by 25% on the previous year.MethodsHand-searching by the editors of all papers published in Resuscitation during 2020. Papers were selected based on then general interest and novelty and were categorised into general themes.ResultsA total of 103 papers were selected for brief mention in this review.ConclusionsResuscitation science continues to evolve rapidly and incorporate all links in the chain of survival
The evaluation of scientific content by researchers, as well as the knowledge networks and working g...
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care...
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-revi...
BACKGROUND This review is the latest in a series of regular annual reviews undertaken by the edit...
BACKGROUND This review is the latest in a series of regular annual reviews undertaken by the edit...
Background:Every year the American Heart Association\u27s Resuscitation Science Symposium (ReSS) bri...
Editorial. The number and quality of manuscripts submitted to Resuscitation continues to rise. The e...
Editorial: We are delighted to report that the number and quality of manuscripts submitted to Resusc...
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a near-continuous review of cardi...
We are delighted to report that the number and quality of manuscripts submitted to Resuscitation con...
Following the publication in 2010 of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Co...
Editorial: This is the second of two editorials that review key papers published in Resuscitation in...
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care...
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a near-continuous review of cardi...
The purpose of this review was to give an overview of the most significant updates in resuscitation ...
The evaluation of scientific content by researchers, as well as the knowledge networks and working g...
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care...
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-revi...
BACKGROUND This review is the latest in a series of regular annual reviews undertaken by the edit...
BACKGROUND This review is the latest in a series of regular annual reviews undertaken by the edit...
Background:Every year the American Heart Association\u27s Resuscitation Science Symposium (ReSS) bri...
Editorial. The number and quality of manuscripts submitted to Resuscitation continues to rise. The e...
Editorial: We are delighted to report that the number and quality of manuscripts submitted to Resusc...
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a near-continuous review of cardi...
We are delighted to report that the number and quality of manuscripts submitted to Resuscitation con...
Following the publication in 2010 of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Co...
Editorial: This is the second of two editorials that review key papers published in Resuscitation in...
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care...
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a near-continuous review of cardi...
The purpose of this review was to give an overview of the most significant updates in resuscitation ...
The evaluation of scientific content by researchers, as well as the knowledge networks and working g...
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care...
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-revi...