This study provides a solution of the equity premium puzzle. Questioning the validity of the Arrow-Pratt measure of relative risk aversion for detecting the risk behavior of investors under all conditions, a new tool, that is, the sufficiency factor of the model was developed to analyze the risk behavior of investors. The calculations of this newly tested model show that the value of the coefficient of relative risk aversion is 1.033526 by assuming the value of the subjective time discount factor as 0.99. Since these values are compatible with the existing empirical studies, they confirm the validity of the newly derived model that provides a solution to the equity premium puzzle.Comment: 41 pages, 7 figures, 1 table, The Section of New Mod...
Abstract This paper modifies the conventional representative-agent consumption-based equilibrium...
Recent research on the equity risk premium has questioned the ability of historical estimates of the...
I model a scenario in which investors do not know the payoff distributions of relatively newer firms...
This study provides the solution to the equity premium puzzle. The new model was developed by includ...
Agents are assumed to have a power risk aversion utility function in an otherwise standard asset pri...
In this paper, I adopt an economic equilibrium model utilizing the framework introduced by Mehra and...
The equity premium puzzle emanates from the inability of the theoretical models to explain the empir...
Standard consumption-based asset pricing models focus on the consumption risk, seen as the only sour...
We reexamine the level and volatility of the equity premium in an overlapping generations environmen...
What happens when the anchoring and adjustment heuristic of Tversky and Kahneman (1974) is incorpora...
This paper applies recent tests of stochastic dominance of several orders proposed by Linton, Maasou...
We review a recent approach to understanding the equity premium puzzle. The key elements of this app...
This paper develops an equilibrium asset pricing framework that allows for investor aggregation, and...
This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University.Pr...
Imagine an individual facing three identical investment decisions in a row. Each time she decides o...
Abstract This paper modifies the conventional representative-agent consumption-based equilibrium...
Recent research on the equity risk premium has questioned the ability of historical estimates of the...
I model a scenario in which investors do not know the payoff distributions of relatively newer firms...
This study provides the solution to the equity premium puzzle. The new model was developed by includ...
Agents are assumed to have a power risk aversion utility function in an otherwise standard asset pri...
In this paper, I adopt an economic equilibrium model utilizing the framework introduced by Mehra and...
The equity premium puzzle emanates from the inability of the theoretical models to explain the empir...
Standard consumption-based asset pricing models focus on the consumption risk, seen as the only sour...
We reexamine the level and volatility of the equity premium in an overlapping generations environmen...
What happens when the anchoring and adjustment heuristic of Tversky and Kahneman (1974) is incorpora...
This paper applies recent tests of stochastic dominance of several orders proposed by Linton, Maasou...
We review a recent approach to understanding the equity premium puzzle. The key elements of this app...
This paper develops an equilibrium asset pricing framework that allows for investor aggregation, and...
This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University.Pr...
Imagine an individual facing three identical investment decisions in a row. Each time she decides o...
Abstract This paper modifies the conventional representative-agent consumption-based equilibrium...
Recent research on the equity risk premium has questioned the ability of historical estimates of the...
I model a scenario in which investors do not know the payoff distributions of relatively newer firms...