Defendant, incorporated in 1938 with an authorized capital stock of 500 shares, amended its articles of incorporation in 1940 to increase the common stock to 2,000 shares, and to authorize the issue of preferred stock. By the amendment, the voting power was vested exclusively in the common stock, with the exception that the holders of preferred stock would acquire temporary voting power upon default of four semi-annual dividends. Default in payment of dividends occurred and the preferred stockholders exercised the right to vote from 1943 on. In 1953, a second amendment was proposed and passed by a majority in interest vote of the common stockholders and a unanimous vote of the preferred stockholders. By this second amendment voting power wa...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder, brought an action to cancel 58,400 shares of originally authorize...
Plaintiff, a stockholder in defendant corporation, sought to enjoin distribution of dividends on a p...
Plaintiffs owned 6 percent cumulative convertible prior preferred stock in defendant corporation. Th...
In a statutory action brought by a stockholder to determine the validity of an election of directors...
The Supreme Court of Michigan recently decided the case of Ecclestone v. Indialantic, Inc., the impo...
A,B, and C, petitioners, and X and Y, respondents, owned all the stock in a corporation. On Septembe...
Plaintiff filed a petition in equity attacking his removal as a director and president of the defend...
The defendant, a Michigan corporation, adopted a constitution (by-laws) which contained the follow...
In 1943 defendant corporation\u27s charter was amended to cancel 5 per cent cumulative preferred sto...
The malignant decision in the Dartmouth College case fathered the passage of reserved-power statut...
The original owner of a subdivision recorded a declaration of restrictions which provided that the ...
A, B, and C are directors of, and own all the stock in, X Corporation. At a directors\u27 meeting B ...
Defendant, a New York corporation, was engaged in operating steamboats for sightseeing purposes belo...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder, brought an action to cancel 58,400 shares of originally authorize...
Plaintiff, a stockholder in defendant corporation, sought to enjoin distribution of dividends on a p...
Plaintiffs owned 6 percent cumulative convertible prior preferred stock in defendant corporation. Th...
In a statutory action brought by a stockholder to determine the validity of an election of directors...
The Supreme Court of Michigan recently decided the case of Ecclestone v. Indialantic, Inc., the impo...
A,B, and C, petitioners, and X and Y, respondents, owned all the stock in a corporation. On Septembe...
Plaintiff filed a petition in equity attacking his removal as a director and president of the defend...
The defendant, a Michigan corporation, adopted a constitution (by-laws) which contained the follow...
In 1943 defendant corporation\u27s charter was amended to cancel 5 per cent cumulative preferred sto...
The malignant decision in the Dartmouth College case fathered the passage of reserved-power statut...
The original owner of a subdivision recorded a declaration of restrictions which provided that the ...
A, B, and C are directors of, and own all the stock in, X Corporation. At a directors\u27 meeting B ...
Defendant, a New York corporation, was engaged in operating steamboats for sightseeing purposes belo...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
Plaintiff, a minority stockholder, brought an action to cancel 58,400 shares of originally authorize...
Plaintiff, a stockholder in defendant corporation, sought to enjoin distribution of dividends on a p...