Add to ORKGThis book consists of four nonpartisan debates about the existence of God. Each debate examines distinct related areas of evidence for and against naturalism and theism. The topics of the first debate are the mind and the will, and the debaters are a naturalist, Andrew Melnyk, and two theists, Steward Goetz and Charles Taliaferro. Next, Paul Draper defends an evolutionary argument from evil against theism, while Alvin Plantinga argues that evolutionary naturalism is self-defeating. In the final two debates, Quentin Smith and Robin Collins examine evidence from the physical sciences, while John Schellenberg and Jeffrey Jordan debate divine hiddenness and pragmatic justifications of theistic belief
Naturalism is the claim that the natural sciences alone produce genuine knowledge or, at the very le...
Philosophical naturalism is taken to be the preferred and reigning epistemology and metaphysics that...
Evolutionary debunking arguments, whether defended by Street (2006), Joyce (2006), or others against...
Phillip Johnson, in a number of recent writings, most notably in his 1991 book, Darwin on Trial. has...
God and Evidence presents a new set of compelling problems for theistic philosophers. The problems p...
When philosophers argue over whether a philosophical belief is true, they do so by offering and eval...
The question of whether or not God exists is endlessly fascinating and profoundly important. Now two...
Building upon the reputation of the first edition, the extensively revised second edition of Contemp...
Many prominent Christians insist that the church must yield to contemporary evolutionary theory and ...
Abstract: During the past two decades, Alvin Plantinga has formulated an argument against naturalism...
The shadow of David Hume, the eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher, has loomed large against all ...
Alvin Plantinga and Phillip E. Johnson strongly attack "metaphysical naturalism", a doctrine based, ...
In the early twenty-first century, public discussions about God have moved on from simplistic ‘fire ...
The Rationality of Theism is a controversial collection of brand new papers by thirteen outstanding ...
A debate between a humanist and a theist about if there are any beings that exist beyond nature
Naturalism is the claim that the natural sciences alone produce genuine knowledge or, at the very le...
Philosophical naturalism is taken to be the preferred and reigning epistemology and metaphysics that...
Evolutionary debunking arguments, whether defended by Street (2006), Joyce (2006), or others against...
Phillip Johnson, in a number of recent writings, most notably in his 1991 book, Darwin on Trial. has...
God and Evidence presents a new set of compelling problems for theistic philosophers. The problems p...
When philosophers argue over whether a philosophical belief is true, they do so by offering and eval...
The question of whether or not God exists is endlessly fascinating and profoundly important. Now two...
Building upon the reputation of the first edition, the extensively revised second edition of Contemp...
Many prominent Christians insist that the church must yield to contemporary evolutionary theory and ...
Abstract: During the past two decades, Alvin Plantinga has formulated an argument against naturalism...
The shadow of David Hume, the eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher, has loomed large against all ...
Alvin Plantinga and Phillip E. Johnson strongly attack "metaphysical naturalism", a doctrine based, ...
In the early twenty-first century, public discussions about God have moved on from simplistic ‘fire ...
The Rationality of Theism is a controversial collection of brand new papers by thirteen outstanding ...
A debate between a humanist and a theist about if there are any beings that exist beyond nature
Naturalism is the claim that the natural sciences alone produce genuine knowledge or, at the very le...
Philosophical naturalism is taken to be the preferred and reigning epistemology and metaphysics that...
Evolutionary debunking arguments, whether defended by Street (2006), Joyce (2006), or others against...