With eleven sections plus an introduction and a conclusion, Goldfinger et al. (2014) thoroughly dispose of our case on the inadequacy of the Ecological Footprint (Giampietro and Saltelli, 2014) published on this journal. We identify circularity and contradiction in the argument of Goldfinger et al. (2014) and consolidate our case on the lack in coherence between the EF ambition to quantification and its evanescent architecture. We find confirmation of the non-relevance and counter productivity of this measure for policy consumption.JRC.DDG.01-Econometrics and applied statistic
AbstractThe paper proposes a measure of renewable bio-capacity. We argue that some dimensions of eco...
The national ecological footprint of both consumption and production are significantly spatially aut...
The human family is currently on an unsustainable development path, which is likely to lead to a ful...
[1] set out to demonstrate that ‘‘Ecological Footprint measure-ments, as currently constructed, are ...
Summary: This article argues that policies aimed at sustainability need to address the spatial dimen...
The paper studied the importance of Ecological Footprint (EF) for estimating the biologically produc...
Despite its relative youth (less than two decades), the ecological footprint (EF) is a commonly used...
our concern that this exchange will confuse readers. For this reason, we aim to emphasize a few key ...
We present a comprehensive review of perceptions and methods around the Ecological Footprint (EF), b...
Abstract We respond to a reaction of the Global Footprint Network/GFN on our 8-point criticism of th...
AbstractEcological Footprint and biocapacity metrics have been widely used in natural capital and ec...
The Ecological Footprint (EF) has become a very popular alternative indicator of development in the ...
In recent years, footprint indicators have emerged as a popular mode of reporting environmental perf...
We assess threats to environmental sustainability by examining the trends in three measures of the e...
Linus Blomqvist, Barry W. Brook, Erle C. Ellis, Peter M. Kareiva, Ted Nordhaus, Michael Shellenberge
AbstractThe paper proposes a measure of renewable bio-capacity. We argue that some dimensions of eco...
The national ecological footprint of both consumption and production are significantly spatially aut...
The human family is currently on an unsustainable development path, which is likely to lead to a ful...
[1] set out to demonstrate that ‘‘Ecological Footprint measure-ments, as currently constructed, are ...
Summary: This article argues that policies aimed at sustainability need to address the spatial dimen...
The paper studied the importance of Ecological Footprint (EF) for estimating the biologically produc...
Despite its relative youth (less than two decades), the ecological footprint (EF) is a commonly used...
our concern that this exchange will confuse readers. For this reason, we aim to emphasize a few key ...
We present a comprehensive review of perceptions and methods around the Ecological Footprint (EF), b...
Abstract We respond to a reaction of the Global Footprint Network/GFN on our 8-point criticism of th...
AbstractEcological Footprint and biocapacity metrics have been widely used in natural capital and ec...
The Ecological Footprint (EF) has become a very popular alternative indicator of development in the ...
In recent years, footprint indicators have emerged as a popular mode of reporting environmental perf...
We assess threats to environmental sustainability by examining the trends in three measures of the e...
Linus Blomqvist, Barry W. Brook, Erle C. Ellis, Peter M. Kareiva, Ted Nordhaus, Michael Shellenberge
AbstractThe paper proposes a measure of renewable bio-capacity. We argue that some dimensions of eco...
The national ecological footprint of both consumption and production are significantly spatially aut...
The human family is currently on an unsustainable development path, which is likely to lead to a ful...