The principle of counter-transitivity plays a vital role in argumentation. It states that an argument is strong when its attackers are weak, and is weak when its attackers are strong. In this work, we develop a formal theory about the argument ranking semantics based on this principle. Three approaches, quantity-based, quality-based and the unity of them, are defined to implement the principle. Then, we show an iterative refinement algorithm for capturing the ranking on arguments based on the recursive nature of the principle
Preferences play a key role in computational argumentation in AI, as they reflect various notions of...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Ranking-based semantics re...
International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a letha...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and compar-ing a set of arguments. A way to compare them co...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
Abstract. Recently, ranking-based semantics is proposed to rank-order argu-ments from the most accep...
International audienceIn this work, we question the ability of existing ranking-based semantics to c...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating th...
The paper develops a formal theory of the degree of justification of arguments, which relies solely ...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
Preferences play a key role in computational argumentation in AI, as they reflect various notions of...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Ranking-based semantics re...
International audienceIn almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a letha...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and compar-ing a set of arguments. A way to compare them co...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them con...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
Abstract. Recently, ranking-based semantics is proposed to rank-order argu-ments from the most accep...
International audienceIn this work, we question the ability of existing ranking-based semantics to c...
International audienceIn this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for ar...
An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating th...
The paper develops a formal theory of the degree of justification of arguments, which relies solely ...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
Preferences play a key role in computational argumentation in AI, as they reflect various notions of...
In this work, we discuss the realisability problem for ranking-based semantics in the area of abstra...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...