We present a series of test metrics, artifacts, and procedures for characterizing and verifying the operating limits of a short-range non-contact three-dimensional imaging system. These metrics have been designed to correspond to dimensioning and tolerancing metrics that are widely used in industry (e.g. automotive, aerospace, etc.). We introduce operating limit metrics that correspond with the geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) metrics of Form (Flatness and Circularity), Orientation (Angularity), Location (Sphere, Corner, and Hole Position Errors), and Size (Diameter, Sphere-spacing, Plane-spacing and Angle Errors). An example is presented to illustrate how these metrics, artifacts, and associated test procedures can be used in ...
The performance of 3D Imaging Systems needs to be evaluated using a common terminology and test proc...
The performance of 2D digital imaging systems depends on several factors related with both optical a...
Within the context of the ASTM E57 working group WK12373, we compare the two methods that had been i...
We present a method for evaluating the performance of short-range non-contact 3D imaging systems. Th...
A set of test procedures and known artifacts to characterize the capability of short-range triangula...
A set of test procedures and certified artifacts to characterize the capability of short-range trian...
Statistically-traceable procedures are presented to describe the performance of a 3D imaging system,...
Three-dimensional (3D) imaging systems are now widely available, but standards, best practices and c...
We present a series of dimensional metrology procedures for evaluating the geometrical performance o...
An independent means of 3D image quality assessment is introduced, addressing non-professional users...
An independent means of 3D image quality assessment is introduced, addressing non-professional users...
A significant issue for companies or organizations integrating non-contact three-dimensional (3D) im...
© 2016 The AuthorsThe modelling, benchmarking and selection process for non-contact 3D imaging syste...
Manufacturers often express the performance of a 3D imaging device in various non-uniform ways for t...
In this article, we present the proposed standard ASTM E57.02 \u201cTest Method to Evaluate the Rang...
The performance of 3D Imaging Systems needs to be evaluated using a common terminology and test proc...
The performance of 2D digital imaging systems depends on several factors related with both optical a...
Within the context of the ASTM E57 working group WK12373, we compare the two methods that had been i...
We present a method for evaluating the performance of short-range non-contact 3D imaging systems. Th...
A set of test procedures and known artifacts to characterize the capability of short-range triangula...
A set of test procedures and certified artifacts to characterize the capability of short-range trian...
Statistically-traceable procedures are presented to describe the performance of a 3D imaging system,...
Three-dimensional (3D) imaging systems are now widely available, but standards, best practices and c...
We present a series of dimensional metrology procedures for evaluating the geometrical performance o...
An independent means of 3D image quality assessment is introduced, addressing non-professional users...
An independent means of 3D image quality assessment is introduced, addressing non-professional users...
A significant issue for companies or organizations integrating non-contact three-dimensional (3D) im...
© 2016 The AuthorsThe modelling, benchmarking and selection process for non-contact 3D imaging syste...
Manufacturers often express the performance of a 3D imaging device in various non-uniform ways for t...
In this article, we present the proposed standard ASTM E57.02 \u201cTest Method to Evaluate the Rang...
The performance of 3D Imaging Systems needs to be evaluated using a common terminology and test proc...
The performance of 2D digital imaging systems depends on several factors related with both optical a...
Within the context of the ASTM E57 working group WK12373, we compare the two methods that had been i...