Add to ORKGThis paper compares four approaches to using science in regulatory decision making - one very similar to the Science Court proposal. Professor Jasanoff argues generally that that proposal would be less useful than procedures more sensitive to the distinctive characteristics of regulatory science
Wagner argues that the good-science reforms miss the mark and have the potential to cause significan...
Regulating technologies, innovations and risks is an activity that, as much as scientific research n...
[Excerpt] The frequency and magnitude of risks and benefits are facts. The acceptability of risks a...
This paper analyzes the potential for science courts to address the social need to regulate human ca...
This article provides a framework for consideration of values in the use of science in the regulator...
Regulatory science encompasses the participation of a large array of scientific disciplines involved...
Meaningful public participation has been perceived as difficult to accommodate in regulatory proceed...
Professor Shapiro notes that, e.g., advisory committees may increase technical accuracy at the price...
Regulation of toxic substances is an extremely complex, uncertain, and controversial enterprise. The...
This broad authority to assess risk, however, leaves too much discretion to administrative agencies....
This brief commentary will argue that whether hormesis is considered in regulatory risk assessment i...
National regulation is frequently premised on scientific assump- tions; much of regulatory design i...
Regulatory science, which generates knowledge relevant for regulatory decision‐making, is different ...
This article examines the use of epidemiology to evaluate Risks posed by toxic substances. Using ill...
How can empirical evidence of adverse effects from exposure to noxious agents, which is often incomp...
Wagner argues that the good-science reforms miss the mark and have the potential to cause significan...
Regulating technologies, innovations and risks is an activity that, as much as scientific research n...
[Excerpt] The frequency and magnitude of risks and benefits are facts. The acceptability of risks a...
This paper analyzes the potential for science courts to address the social need to regulate human ca...
This article provides a framework for consideration of values in the use of science in the regulator...
Regulatory science encompasses the participation of a large array of scientific disciplines involved...
Meaningful public participation has been perceived as difficult to accommodate in regulatory proceed...
Professor Shapiro notes that, e.g., advisory committees may increase technical accuracy at the price...
Regulation of toxic substances is an extremely complex, uncertain, and controversial enterprise. The...
This broad authority to assess risk, however, leaves too much discretion to administrative agencies....
This brief commentary will argue that whether hormesis is considered in regulatory risk assessment i...
National regulation is frequently premised on scientific assump- tions; much of regulatory design i...
Regulatory science, which generates knowledge relevant for regulatory decision‐making, is different ...
This article examines the use of epidemiology to evaluate Risks posed by toxic substances. Using ill...
How can empirical evidence of adverse effects from exposure to noxious agents, which is often incomp...
Wagner argues that the good-science reforms miss the mark and have the potential to cause significan...
Regulating technologies, innovations and risks is an activity that, as much as scientific research n...
[Excerpt] The frequency and magnitude of risks and benefits are facts. The acceptability of risks a...
