[Excerpt] Last week, for the second time since becoming president, President Donald Trump ordered a military strike on Syria without seeking or obtaining authorization from Congress. Both strikes were responsive to chemical-weapons attacks that, American intelligence analysts say, the Syrian government launched against its own people. Many believe that these forceful responses to horrific war crimes involving banned weapons were morally justified. But were they constitutional
What are the President’s war-making powers? This essay, a brief reply to an article by Curtis Bradle...
This Note examines the constitutionality and wisdom of both aspects of the current warfare policy. U...
The 1949 Geneva Conventions do not justify US missile strikes in Syria in response to chemical weapo...
[Excerpt] Last week, for the second time since becoming president, President Donald Trump ordered a ...
This paper is a lightly-footnoted and modestly expanded version of my presentation at the Georgetown...
On April 6, 2017, the United States launched fifty-nine Tomahawk missiles against an air base in Syr...
This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the link in this record.M...
In this Essay, Professor Matthew Waxman argues that debates about constitutional war powers neglect ...
Waterboarding and “much worse,” torture, and “tak[ing] out” the family members of terrorists: Presid...
The United States and Iran carried out armed reprisals in Syria during 2017 in the wake of chemical ...
The use of military force to respond to a foreign humanitarian crisis raises profound legal question...
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush adm...
I]t is an established fact that documents justifying and authorizing the abusive treatment ofdetaine...
Much of the scholarship on war powers looks back on whether U.S. military interventions were authori...
In light of the history of the United States Constitution and the continued expansion of Presidentia...
What are the President’s war-making powers? This essay, a brief reply to an article by Curtis Bradle...
This Note examines the constitutionality and wisdom of both aspects of the current warfare policy. U...
The 1949 Geneva Conventions do not justify US missile strikes in Syria in response to chemical weapo...
[Excerpt] Last week, for the second time since becoming president, President Donald Trump ordered a ...
This paper is a lightly-footnoted and modestly expanded version of my presentation at the Georgetown...
On April 6, 2017, the United States launched fifty-nine Tomahawk missiles against an air base in Syr...
This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the link in this record.M...
In this Essay, Professor Matthew Waxman argues that debates about constitutional war powers neglect ...
Waterboarding and “much worse,” torture, and “tak[ing] out” the family members of terrorists: Presid...
The United States and Iran carried out armed reprisals in Syria during 2017 in the wake of chemical ...
The use of military force to respond to a foreign humanitarian crisis raises profound legal question...
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush adm...
I]t is an established fact that documents justifying and authorizing the abusive treatment ofdetaine...
Much of the scholarship on war powers looks back on whether U.S. military interventions were authori...
In light of the history of the United States Constitution and the continued expansion of Presidentia...
What are the President’s war-making powers? This essay, a brief reply to an article by Curtis Bradle...
This Note examines the constitutionality and wisdom of both aspects of the current warfare policy. U...
The 1949 Geneva Conventions do not justify US missile strikes in Syria in response to chemical weapo...