The paper shows the importance of peer review process in the scholarly communication system and discusses both the closed and the newly emerging open peer review models. It also examines the peer review system at the scholarly academies or societies in their nomination systems for prizes, rewards, etc. It also discusses the various facets of the newly developed open peer review models now prevalent in various journals. The paper may help to understand and appreciate the role played by peer review in the scholarly communication system and the efforts being made to make it more transparent
This paper traces the origin and evolution of the traditional peer review system, and shows its stre...
Jon Tennant takes a look at the transformations underway aimed at tackling the widespread dissatisfa...
This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer re...
152-162The paper shows the importance of peer review process in the scholarly communication system a...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
The purpose of this paper is to consider alternatives to the traditional system of peer review. I wi...
Though supported by a large number of scholars in Scientific, Technical, and Medical (STM) disciplin...
Peer review is the defining feature of scholarly communication. In a 2018 survey of more than 11,000...
Though supported by a large number of scholars in Scientific, Technical, and Medical (STM) disciplin...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
This paper briefly explains what peer review is, the benefits of peer review and its different forms...
This research observes the emerging open peer review journals. In scientific publishing, transparenc...
This research observes the emerging open peer review journals. In scientific publishing, transparenc...
This paper traces the origin and evolution of the traditional peer review system, and shows its stre...
Jon Tennant takes a look at the transformations underway aimed at tackling the widespread dissatisfa...
This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer re...
152-162The paper shows the importance of peer review process in the scholarly communication system a...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
The purpose of this paper is to consider alternatives to the traditional system of peer review. I wi...
Though supported by a large number of scholars in Scientific, Technical, and Medical (STM) disciplin...
Peer review is the defining feature of scholarly communication. In a 2018 survey of more than 11,000...
Though supported by a large number of scholars in Scientific, Technical, and Medical (STM) disciplin...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
This paper briefly explains what peer review is, the benefits of peer review and its different forms...
This research observes the emerging open peer review journals. In scientific publishing, transparenc...
This research observes the emerging open peer review journals. In scientific publishing, transparenc...
This paper traces the origin and evolution of the traditional peer review system, and shows its stre...
Jon Tennant takes a look at the transformations underway aimed at tackling the widespread dissatisfa...
This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer re...