The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts in the field providing comments for a submitted article. The reviewer remains anonymous to the author, with only the editor knowing the reviewer´s identity. This model is now being challenged and open peer review (OPR) models are viewed as the new frontier of the review process. OPR is a term that encompasses diverse variations in the traditional review process. Examples of this are modifications in the way in which authors and reviewers are aware of each other’s identity (open identities), the visibility of the reviews carried out (open reviews) or the opening up of the review to the academic community (open participation). We present the pr...
Openness in peer review is no longer a terra incognita. However, there remains a need for further ex...
We present the first open peer review module for open access repositories. The module, designed in t...
Peer review truly, is the king in scientific communication –however, traditional peer review has bee...
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts ...
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts ...
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts ...
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts ...
The Open Peer Review Module (OPRM) project, funded by OpenAire and carried out by a consortium led ...
The Open Peer Review Module (OPRM) project, funded by OpenAire and carried out by a consortium led ...
Research productivity is increasing at an unprecedented rate. Technological innovations, a surge in...
One important element missing from open access repositories is a quantitative assessment of the host...
Open peer review (OPR) is an important innovation in the open science movement. OPR can play a signi...
Open peer review (OPR) is a type of review that has long since made space alongside the more well-kn...
Open peer review (OPR) is a type of review that has long since made space alongside the more well-kn...
Peer review truly, is the king in scientific communication –however, traditional peer review has bee...
Openness in peer review is no longer a terra incognita. However, there remains a need for further ex...
We present the first open peer review module for open access repositories. The module, designed in t...
Peer review truly, is the king in scientific communication –however, traditional peer review has bee...
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts ...
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts ...
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts ...
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts ...
The Open Peer Review Module (OPRM) project, funded by OpenAire and carried out by a consortium led ...
The Open Peer Review Module (OPRM) project, funded by OpenAire and carried out by a consortium led ...
Research productivity is increasing at an unprecedented rate. Technological innovations, a surge in...
One important element missing from open access repositories is a quantitative assessment of the host...
Open peer review (OPR) is an important innovation in the open science movement. OPR can play a signi...
Open peer review (OPR) is a type of review that has long since made space alongside the more well-kn...
Open peer review (OPR) is a type of review that has long since made space alongside the more well-kn...
Peer review truly, is the king in scientific communication –however, traditional peer review has bee...
Openness in peer review is no longer a terra incognita. However, there remains a need for further ex...
We present the first open peer review module for open access repositories. The module, designed in t...
Peer review truly, is the king in scientific communication –however, traditional peer review has bee...