Add to ORKGThe article discusses the legal concept known as the Brady doctrine, derived from the U.S. Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, particularly the requirement of materiality on the part of the government. It examines Rule 3.8(e) of the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, examples of the Brady doctrine, and related cases such as Smith v. Cain, Connick v. Thompson, and In re Kline
Decided in 1963, Brady v. Maryland imposes on prosecutors a duty to share with defendants informatio...
Why not criminal discovery? This question has been posited by legal scholars and learned jurists ali...
In this article, the author proposes that the prosecution’s obligation to disclose exculpatory infor...
The article discusses the legal concept known as the Brady doctrine, derived from the U.S. Supreme C...
Part I of this Article describes the evolution of the Brady rule over the past forty-three years. Pa...
How we think about the trial process, and the assumptions and beliefs we bring to bear on that proce...
After the exoneration of more than 200 people based on post-conviction DNA evidence, a growing movem...
The government’s duty to disclose favorable evidence to the defense under Brady v. Maryland has beco...
In Brady v. Maryland, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to ...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland presented prosecutors with new professional challe...
This Article addresses the intersection of the rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and AB...
In Brady v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court held that the prosecution’s withholding of mat...
Brady v. Maryland imposes a disclosure obligation on the prosecutor and, for this reason, is underst...
Part I of this Article discusses Imbler’s adoption of absolute immunity for prosecutors. Part II dis...
By any measure, Brady v. Maryland has not lived up to its expectations. Brady\u27s announcement of a...
Decided in 1963, Brady v. Maryland imposes on prosecutors a duty to share with defendants informatio...
Why not criminal discovery? This question has been posited by legal scholars and learned jurists ali...
In this article, the author proposes that the prosecution’s obligation to disclose exculpatory infor...
The article discusses the legal concept known as the Brady doctrine, derived from the U.S. Supreme C...
Part I of this Article describes the evolution of the Brady rule over the past forty-three years. Pa...
How we think about the trial process, and the assumptions and beliefs we bring to bear on that proce...
After the exoneration of more than 200 people based on post-conviction DNA evidence, a growing movem...
The government’s duty to disclose favorable evidence to the defense under Brady v. Maryland has beco...
In Brady v. Maryland, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to ...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland presented prosecutors with new professional challe...
This Article addresses the intersection of the rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and AB...
In Brady v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court held that the prosecution’s withholding of mat...
Brady v. Maryland imposes a disclosure obligation on the prosecutor and, for this reason, is underst...
Part I of this Article discusses Imbler’s adoption of absolute immunity for prosecutors. Part II dis...
By any measure, Brady v. Maryland has not lived up to its expectations. Brady\u27s announcement of a...
Decided in 1963, Brady v. Maryland imposes on prosecutors a duty to share with defendants informatio...
Why not criminal discovery? This question has been posited by legal scholars and learned jurists ali...
In this article, the author proposes that the prosecution’s obligation to disclose exculpatory infor...