Add to ORKGThe privilege against self-incrimination is perhaps the most controversial concept in criminal justice. This article analyses the privilege in the context of pre-trial interrogation in the light of the recent and important decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal in PP v Mazlan bin Maidun and seeks to argue that, although the decline of the privilege is not to be lamented in itself, it cannot be simply discarded without the introduction of alternative safeguards
This paper examines the historical and theoretical basis of the privilege against self-incrimination...
The purpose of this Article is to evaluate the arguments that have been made by judges and legal com...
The questions of the extent of an attorney\u27s right to claim the privilege against self-incriminat...
This article revisits the different justifications of the privilege against self-incrimination and e...
While recognized in a large number of jurisdictions, the privilege against self-incrimination proves...
This article revisits the different justifications of the privilege against self-incrimination and e...
As the European Court of Human Rights has come to qualify the privilege against self-incrimination a...
This Article addresses the question of whether the privilege against selfincrimination should cover ...
The Federal Government and forty-six states have incorporated within their constitutions the common ...
It is an inveterate principle of the common law, adopted by common law jurisdictions that any person...
This article employs probability theory to make sense of the authorities of Australia, the United Ki...
In the spring of 1964 the United States Supreme Court decided a group of cases which raise serious q...
At common law, the privilege against self-incrimination protects the accused solely against compelle...
The right to silence, or privilege against self-incrimination, which is protected by the common law,...
It is an inveterate principle of the common law, adopted by common law jurisdictions that any person...
This paper examines the historical and theoretical basis of the privilege against self-incrimination...
The purpose of this Article is to evaluate the arguments that have been made by judges and legal com...
The questions of the extent of an attorney\u27s right to claim the privilege against self-incriminat...
This article revisits the different justifications of the privilege against self-incrimination and e...
While recognized in a large number of jurisdictions, the privilege against self-incrimination proves...
This article revisits the different justifications of the privilege against self-incrimination and e...
As the European Court of Human Rights has come to qualify the privilege against self-incrimination a...
This Article addresses the question of whether the privilege against selfincrimination should cover ...
The Federal Government and forty-six states have incorporated within their constitutions the common ...
It is an inveterate principle of the common law, adopted by common law jurisdictions that any person...
This article employs probability theory to make sense of the authorities of Australia, the United Ki...
In the spring of 1964 the United States Supreme Court decided a group of cases which raise serious q...
At common law, the privilege against self-incrimination protects the accused solely against compelle...
The right to silence, or privilege against self-incrimination, which is protected by the common law,...
It is an inveterate principle of the common law, adopted by common law jurisdictions that any person...
This paper examines the historical and theoretical basis of the privilege against self-incrimination...
The purpose of this Article is to evaluate the arguments that have been made by judges and legal com...
The questions of the extent of an attorney\u27s right to claim the privilege against self-incriminat...