Compares the two ways provided by the Companies Act 2006 s.260(2) by which a shareholder may bring a derivative action. Outlines the procedure under Pt 11, but focuses on the court's power to authorise the bringing of a derivative action pursuant to an unfair prejudice petition, by way of a remedy to give relief from the unfairly prejudicial conduct. Argues that there are inconsistencies between the two procedures, and proposes amendment of the Act. Discusses the Hong Kong Court of First Instance judgment in Re Shun Tak Holdings Ltd
The protection of minority shareholders has become one of the key features of company law reform in ...
Using a dataset of Chinese judicial opinions arising in over fifty cases, this paper analyses the de...
This Chapter consider the scope and application of the unfairly prejudicial remedy available to shar...
Abstract: Purpose - To consider whether the courts, in addressing petitions under section 994 of the...
PhD ThesisIn recent years, the law on derivative actions has caused much academic and judicial debat...
This Chapter considers the nature and scope of the provisions in the Companies Act 2006, Part 11, cr...
On 1 October 2007 a significant portion of the Companies Act 2006 (‘the Act’) became ope...
nicht angegebenThe company’s independent right to sue is the basis of a derivative action. The meani...
In October 2007 a statutory scheme, designed to address the issue of derivative actions, came into f...
Reflects on the statutory derivative claims introduced by the Companies Act 2006 Pt 11, and whether ...
If a company suffers a wrong then prima facie it is the company that should seek redress for that w...
Derivative action is an action filed by shareholders against corporate directors in order to recove...
This paper considers how principles of corporate social responsibility can be implemented in the UK,...
This paper concerns one of the thorniest aspects in company law: the derivative action. China’s intr...
A number of countries have statutory derivative actions. They allow a shareholder to bring legal act...
The protection of minority shareholders has become one of the key features of company law reform in ...
Using a dataset of Chinese judicial opinions arising in over fifty cases, this paper analyses the de...
This Chapter consider the scope and application of the unfairly prejudicial remedy available to shar...
Abstract: Purpose - To consider whether the courts, in addressing petitions under section 994 of the...
PhD ThesisIn recent years, the law on derivative actions has caused much academic and judicial debat...
This Chapter considers the nature and scope of the provisions in the Companies Act 2006, Part 11, cr...
On 1 October 2007 a significant portion of the Companies Act 2006 (‘the Act’) became ope...
nicht angegebenThe company’s independent right to sue is the basis of a derivative action. The meani...
In October 2007 a statutory scheme, designed to address the issue of derivative actions, came into f...
Reflects on the statutory derivative claims introduced by the Companies Act 2006 Pt 11, and whether ...
If a company suffers a wrong then prima facie it is the company that should seek redress for that w...
Derivative action is an action filed by shareholders against corporate directors in order to recove...
This paper considers how principles of corporate social responsibility can be implemented in the UK,...
This paper concerns one of the thorniest aspects in company law: the derivative action. China’s intr...
A number of countries have statutory derivative actions. They allow a shareholder to bring legal act...
The protection of minority shareholders has become one of the key features of company law reform in ...
Using a dataset of Chinese judicial opinions arising in over fifty cases, this paper analyses the de...
This Chapter consider the scope and application of the unfairly prejudicial remedy available to shar...