This paper considers the nature of expert evidence before turning to the criticisms made and reforms suggested by the Chief Justice’s Working Party on Civil Justice Reform (“CJR”) insofar as they concern its use in the Hong Kong civil courts. The paper then continues with an examination of the changes that will be brought about to the nature and role of expert evidence by virtue of the implementation of the CJR on 2 April 2009. It concludes with a summary and critique of those changes.postprin
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
The apparent link between miscarriages of justice in prosecutions involving expert evidence and the ...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...
This work aims to analyse the legislation proposed by The Law Commission in Great Britain in order t...
Argues that, despite a failure to implement the recommendations in the Law Commission's 2011 report ...
While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert witness i...
In its 2011 report “Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales” (Law Com No.325), ...
In the Law of civil procedure is precisely stated that the court will conduct expertise evidence, ...
This paper is based on library research on the use of expert evidence in the common law system which...
Section 34 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that everyone has the right ...
Evidence is the most relevant procedural activity in any judicial process. Based on this test, the j...
Standards for expert testimony in England & Wales have long been described as laissez-faire and in d...
[Extract] A feature of the common law is that it does not allow witnesses to express opinions, but o...
One of the cornerstones of our society of which we are rightly proud is the criminal justice system....
One of the most persistent questions in criminal evidence relates to the use of (unchallenged) exper...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
The apparent link between miscarriages of justice in prosecutions involving expert evidence and the ...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...
This work aims to analyse the legislation proposed by The Law Commission in Great Britain in order t...
Argues that, despite a failure to implement the recommendations in the Law Commission's 2011 report ...
While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert witness i...
In its 2011 report “Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales” (Law Com No.325), ...
In the Law of civil procedure is precisely stated that the court will conduct expertise evidence, ...
This paper is based on library research on the use of expert evidence in the common law system which...
Section 34 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that everyone has the right ...
Evidence is the most relevant procedural activity in any judicial process. Based on this test, the j...
Standards for expert testimony in England & Wales have long been described as laissez-faire and in d...
[Extract] A feature of the common law is that it does not allow witnesses to express opinions, but o...
One of the cornerstones of our society of which we are rightly proud is the criminal justice system....
One of the most persistent questions in criminal evidence relates to the use of (unchallenged) exper...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
The apparent link between miscarriages of justice in prosecutions involving expert evidence and the ...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...