A recent case (4 April, 2000) to look at the question of valuation under civil engineering conditions in the presence of a mistake has been heard in the Court of Appeal in England. The case is noteworthy because it sets out how the court will balance the often separate issues of mistake and rerating. It could have implications in determining the effect to be given to mistakes in tender documents under other conditions of contract as well. Professor Arthur McInnis provides some insights.published_or_final_versio
In Slip Knot Investments v Du Toit 2011 4 SA 72 (SCA) the Supreme Court of Appeal had to determine i...
Construction industry is of critical significance to the development of Australia regarding economic...
The “two-contract” analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Ron Engineering has created...
Not long ago in this column Professor Arthur McInnis looked at an important new case on mistake and ...
Summarises the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal judgment in Kowloon Development Finance Ltd v Pendex ...
Whilst mistake is a key feature of a Law of Contract syllabus and likely to feature in an examinatio...
The paper discusses the history of the English law doctrine according to which the mistake of law (e...
The paper discusses the history of the English law doctrine according to which the mistake of law (e...
AnalysisThe role of the doctrine of mistake has recently been considered by the Court of Appeal and ...
This article analyses the law of rectification for common mistake in the light of the decision of th...
The extent of the doctrine of contractual mistake of law is evaluated in light of the Court of Appea...
This thesis examines issues concerning the rectification of contractual documents for mistake and th...
A perennially litigious area of the law of negligence is that dealing with builders' liability. The ...
The High Court, in the 1995 landmark case of Bryan v Maloney, held a builder of a residential house ...
In this paper I ask whether English Law should permit rescission for unilateral mistakes in the form...
In Slip Knot Investments v Du Toit 2011 4 SA 72 (SCA) the Supreme Court of Appeal had to determine i...
Construction industry is of critical significance to the development of Australia regarding economic...
The “two-contract” analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Ron Engineering has created...
Not long ago in this column Professor Arthur McInnis looked at an important new case on mistake and ...
Summarises the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal judgment in Kowloon Development Finance Ltd v Pendex ...
Whilst mistake is a key feature of a Law of Contract syllabus and likely to feature in an examinatio...
The paper discusses the history of the English law doctrine according to which the mistake of law (e...
The paper discusses the history of the English law doctrine according to which the mistake of law (e...
AnalysisThe role of the doctrine of mistake has recently been considered by the Court of Appeal and ...
This article analyses the law of rectification for common mistake in the light of the decision of th...
The extent of the doctrine of contractual mistake of law is evaluated in light of the Court of Appea...
This thesis examines issues concerning the rectification of contractual documents for mistake and th...
A perennially litigious area of the law of negligence is that dealing with builders' liability. The ...
The High Court, in the 1995 landmark case of Bryan v Maloney, held a builder of a residential house ...
In this paper I ask whether English Law should permit rescission for unilateral mistakes in the form...
In Slip Knot Investments v Du Toit 2011 4 SA 72 (SCA) the Supreme Court of Appeal had to determine i...
Construction industry is of critical significance to the development of Australia regarding economic...
The “two-contract” analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Ron Engineering has created...