This article considers the question of the extent to which police are, and should, be held liable in negligence for breach of a duty of care, in light of a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court decision which demonstrates continued reluctance to find that a public authority owes a duty of care to members of the public
When, in the performance of their roles, do public authorities owe a private law duty of care to tho...
This article discusses, with reference to leading case law developments such as the Queen's Bench Di...
In Canada, the use of force by police must occur only within the parameters of federal laws, provinc...
This article considers the question of the extent to which police are, and should, be held liable in...
[In 1988 in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the House of Lords denied a duty of care was o...
Police failures may contribute to a failure to prevent injury, or worse. The question of whether the...
This paper analyses the liability of the police service under the tort of negligence in England and ...
When, in the performance of their roles, do public authorities owe a private law duty of care to tho...
In 1988 in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the House of Lords denied a duty of care was ow...
The English legal approach to police negligent liability is highly restrictive. Immunity from prosec...
Nowadays, in most of legal systems »contributory negligence« is a one of the factors that entirely...
Since the House of Lords’ decision in the Gorringe case, there can be no reason for imposing a duty ...
Since the House of Lords’ decision in the Gorringe case, there can be no reason for imposing a duty ...
The effectiveness of the law to provide compensation and accountability to victims of police neglige...
The Supreme Court of Canada, by majority, has found a tort of negligent investigation. The reasons f...
When, in the performance of their roles, do public authorities owe a private law duty of care to tho...
This article discusses, with reference to leading case law developments such as the Queen's Bench Di...
In Canada, the use of force by police must occur only within the parameters of federal laws, provinc...
This article considers the question of the extent to which police are, and should, be held liable in...
[In 1988 in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the House of Lords denied a duty of care was o...
Police failures may contribute to a failure to prevent injury, or worse. The question of whether the...
This paper analyses the liability of the police service under the tort of negligence in England and ...
When, in the performance of their roles, do public authorities owe a private law duty of care to tho...
In 1988 in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the House of Lords denied a duty of care was ow...
The English legal approach to police negligent liability is highly restrictive. Immunity from prosec...
Nowadays, in most of legal systems »contributory negligence« is a one of the factors that entirely...
Since the House of Lords’ decision in the Gorringe case, there can be no reason for imposing a duty ...
Since the House of Lords’ decision in the Gorringe case, there can be no reason for imposing a duty ...
The effectiveness of the law to provide compensation and accountability to victims of police neglige...
The Supreme Court of Canada, by majority, has found a tort of negligent investigation. The reasons f...
When, in the performance of their roles, do public authorities owe a private law duty of care to tho...
This article discusses, with reference to leading case law developments such as the Queen's Bench Di...
In Canada, the use of force by police must occur only within the parameters of federal laws, provinc...