Comment on the trial judge’s decision to direct the jury not to draw adverse inferences from a defendant’s failure to testify, rather than adjourning to obtain medical evidence, where the defendant had experienced seizures in court and therefore could not be called to give evidence
In 1931 the American Law Institute adopted a resolution to the effect that The judge, the prosecuti...
Discusses credit for plea where a case is initially adjourned for a psychiatric report as to fitness...
In R (Wang Yam) v Central Criminal Court the Supreme Court has held that the domestic courts enjoy a...
Comment on the trial judge’s decision to direct the jury not to draw adverse inferences from a defen...
Discusses the circumstances in which a previous consistent statement may be admitted to rebut a sugg...
Discusses the stages at which the strength of the prosecution case is relevant to the question of wh...
Discusses difficulties that arose in attempting to clarify expert DNA evidence for a jury in retirem...
Highlights the Court of Appeal's decision to uphold a ruling that there was no case to answer where ...
Highlights the risks and limitations of psychiatric opinion evidence and nomenclature in addressing ...
Commentary on the use of hearsay statements in domestic abuse cases where the complainant refuses to...
Discusses issues of capacity and cross-examination in sexual offence cases involving complainants wh...
Discusses whether evidence that DNA matching that of the defendant was found on a moveable object is...
Discusses the role of expert evidence where a sentencing guideline requires a judge to assess the de...
Discusses the interplay between the bad character provisions in Part 11 of the Criminal Justice Act ...
The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version.A comment on the Admini...
In 1931 the American Law Institute adopted a resolution to the effect that The judge, the prosecuti...
Discusses credit for plea where a case is initially adjourned for a psychiatric report as to fitness...
In R (Wang Yam) v Central Criminal Court the Supreme Court has held that the domestic courts enjoy a...
Comment on the trial judge’s decision to direct the jury not to draw adverse inferences from a defen...
Discusses the circumstances in which a previous consistent statement may be admitted to rebut a sugg...
Discusses the stages at which the strength of the prosecution case is relevant to the question of wh...
Discusses difficulties that arose in attempting to clarify expert DNA evidence for a jury in retirem...
Highlights the Court of Appeal's decision to uphold a ruling that there was no case to answer where ...
Highlights the risks and limitations of psychiatric opinion evidence and nomenclature in addressing ...
Commentary on the use of hearsay statements in domestic abuse cases where the complainant refuses to...
Discusses issues of capacity and cross-examination in sexual offence cases involving complainants wh...
Discusses whether evidence that DNA matching that of the defendant was found on a moveable object is...
Discusses the role of expert evidence where a sentencing guideline requires a judge to assess the de...
Discusses the interplay between the bad character provisions in Part 11 of the Criminal Justice Act ...
The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version.A comment on the Admini...
In 1931 the American Law Institute adopted a resolution to the effect that The judge, the prosecuti...
Discusses credit for plea where a case is initially adjourned for a psychiatric report as to fitness...
In R (Wang Yam) v Central Criminal Court the Supreme Court has held that the domestic courts enjoy a...