Add to ORKGThe projects drawn up as a response to architectural competitions are a neglected intellectual and cultural resource, but still considered as a repertory of “potential architecture”. Winning or not, whether constructed or not, the value of this projects exceeds their actual success or failure in the context of the competition. A considerable intellectual and creative effort, all the unsuccessful projects over time are on the way of becoming just memories, being unrecognizable in the field of potential architecture.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
In architecture competitions are fascinating. Over the years, they have increasingly become a popula...
Architecture competitions are being generalized in the attribution of architecture contract. The sha...
Architectural competitions are usually seen as a game with only one winner: the architect or team wh...
Achitectural competitions are no longer simply professional praxis for architects and a recurrent ex...
The present book revolves around four key concepts. These concepts are architectural competition, in...
Architectural competitions have been a frequently debated topic in a cross-disciplinary literature o...
Are there recognizable patterns in the way competitions serve the development of architecture practi...
This paper explores architectural competitions as processes of participation and choice. The partici...
The combination of realising buildings with such architectural care that they become high-quality ar...
Architectural competitions are accepted internationally as a way to choose an architect or an archit...
The architecture competition is a high point of interaction between very diverse actors, architectur...
Architectural competitions are usually seen as a game with only one winner: the architect or team wh...
The Nordic tradition of architectural competitions is over a hundred years old and is very significa...
It has been said that architects do not build buildings but instead make drawings. In the making of ...
In 2011 a seemingly 'typical' architectural competition was organised (consisting of a real site, de...
In architecture competitions are fascinating. Over the years, they have increasingly become a popula...
Architecture competitions are being generalized in the attribution of architecture contract. The sha...
Architectural competitions are usually seen as a game with only one winner: the architect or team wh...
Achitectural competitions are no longer simply professional praxis for architects and a recurrent ex...
The present book revolves around four key concepts. These concepts are architectural competition, in...
Architectural competitions have been a frequently debated topic in a cross-disciplinary literature o...
Are there recognizable patterns in the way competitions serve the development of architecture practi...
This paper explores architectural competitions as processes of participation and choice. The partici...
The combination of realising buildings with such architectural care that they become high-quality ar...
Architectural competitions are accepted internationally as a way to choose an architect or an archit...
The architecture competition is a high point of interaction between very diverse actors, architectur...
Architectural competitions are usually seen as a game with only one winner: the architect or team wh...
The Nordic tradition of architectural competitions is over a hundred years old and is very significa...
It has been said that architects do not build buildings but instead make drawings. In the making of ...
In 2011 a seemingly 'typical' architectural competition was organised (consisting of a real site, de...
In architecture competitions are fascinating. Over the years, they have increasingly become a popula...
Architecture competitions are being generalized in the attribution of architecture contract. The sha...
Architectural competitions are usually seen as a game with only one winner: the architect or team wh...