It often is said that in the United States each party pays their own attorney\u27s fees, win or lose, absent a contractual provision to the contrary or some recognized ground in equity. This basic proposition, which is true as far as it goes, is based on the so-called American Rule, which provides that in the United States each side in a litigated case is responsible for paying their own attorney, regardless of the outcome of the case. On its face this proposition seems simple. On the contrary, however, the laws in the United States governing attorney\u27s fees are surprising quite complex. This article provides a general survey of the patchwork of laws, federal and to a lesser extent state, and the author will demonstrate that rules and la...
In the United States absent statute or enforceable contract, litigants pay their own attorney\u27s ...
Unfettered access to the courts is the cornerstone of the American concept of justice, yet even toda...
This material published in Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law is made available by...
It often is said that in the United States each party pays their own attorney’s fees, win or lose, a...
This article develops an analytical framework for viewing the rules on attorney fee arrangements tha...
In the United States the client traditionally pays his or her own attorney; this practice is known a...
The article deals with the influential mechanism of the contingent fee and the American rule on the...
In the United States, the general rule, which derives from common law, is that each side in a legal ...
The ordinary American rule is that all parties must pay their own attorney fees. However, in some C...
Court costs in American civil procedure are allocated to the loser ( loser pays ) as elsewhere in th...
This Note examines- the propriety of awarding attorneys\u27 fees to prevailing pro se litigants in t...
This article surveys the effects of legal fee shifting on a variety of decisions arising before and ...
Court costs in American civil procedure are allocated to the loser (“loser pays”) as elsewhere in th...
Special Project-- Recent Developments in Attorneys\u27 Fees In recent years, the subject of attorney...
Many statutes and rules operating in courts in the United States permit or mandate the shifting of a...
In the United States absent statute or enforceable contract, litigants pay their own attorney\u27s ...
Unfettered access to the courts is the cornerstone of the American concept of justice, yet even toda...
This material published in Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law is made available by...
It often is said that in the United States each party pays their own attorney’s fees, win or lose, a...
This article develops an analytical framework for viewing the rules on attorney fee arrangements tha...
In the United States the client traditionally pays his or her own attorney; this practice is known a...
The article deals with the influential mechanism of the contingent fee and the American rule on the...
In the United States, the general rule, which derives from common law, is that each side in a legal ...
The ordinary American rule is that all parties must pay their own attorney fees. However, in some C...
Court costs in American civil procedure are allocated to the loser ( loser pays ) as elsewhere in th...
This Note examines- the propriety of awarding attorneys\u27 fees to prevailing pro se litigants in t...
This article surveys the effects of legal fee shifting on a variety of decisions arising before and ...
Court costs in American civil procedure are allocated to the loser (“loser pays”) as elsewhere in th...
Special Project-- Recent Developments in Attorneys\u27 Fees In recent years, the subject of attorney...
Many statutes and rules operating in courts in the United States permit or mandate the shifting of a...
In the United States absent statute or enforceable contract, litigants pay their own attorney\u27s ...
Unfettered access to the courts is the cornerstone of the American concept of justice, yet even toda...
This material published in Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law is made available by...