In the quest to tackle electoral malpractice, election observers and political scientists have sought ways to identify when vote counts have been manipulated. One proposed method is to analyse non-random patterns in the last digits of vote counts. Verena Mack and Lukas F. Stoetzer tested this technique and found that it cannot reliably identify fraud, but that such experiments are a useful way to build up a set of potential identifiers of vote manipulation
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
The Last Digit test is a notable method to detect election fraud. It is based on an assumption that ...
Fraudulent elections and disputes about election outcomes are nothing new. Gumbel (2005) reviews the...
Is it possible to detect manipulation by looking only at electoral returns? Drawing on work in psych...
Is it possible to detect manipulation by looking only at electoral returns? Drawing on work in psych...
Controversies about elections are not exactly commonplace, but neither are they rare. In recent year...
This paper proposes a method for detecting electoral fraud in the form of ballot stuffing. As ballot...
Elections in Russia are widely believed to be fraudulent in various ways, a claim some support espec...
Elections in Russia are widely believed to be fraudulent in various ways, a claim some support espec...
Tests of the digits of vote counts have been proposed to diagnose election fraud. Both the second-di...
Integrity of elections relies on fair procedures at different stages of the election process, and fr...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
The Last Digit test is a notable method to detect election fraud. It is based on an assumption that ...
Fraudulent elections and disputes about election outcomes are nothing new. Gumbel (2005) reviews the...
Is it possible to detect manipulation by looking only at electoral returns? Drawing on work in psych...
Is it possible to detect manipulation by looking only at electoral returns? Drawing on work in psych...
Controversies about elections are not exactly commonplace, but neither are they rare. In recent year...
This paper proposes a method for detecting electoral fraud in the form of ballot stuffing. As ballot...
Elections in Russia are widely believed to be fraudulent in various ways, a claim some support espec...
Elections in Russia are widely believed to be fraudulent in various ways, a claim some support espec...
Tests of the digits of vote counts have been proposed to diagnose election fraud. Both the second-di...
Integrity of elections relies on fair procedures at different stages of the election process, and fr...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...
We extend the “fraud forensics” research to systematically explain precinct-level and regional varia...