In this paper, I aim to bring out the implausibility of the claim that there is a class of philosophers of religion—holders of a particular constellation of beliefs about religion—whose religious beliefs are either uniquely rational or uniquely supported by a stock of cogent arguments. My initial focus will be on models of parties to religious disagreements. These models may be simple, but I believe that there is much to be learned from them
Can the 'continuity thesis' upheld by R Boudon - that rationality is an undivided and permanent prop...
Intractable disagreements are commonly analyzed in terms of the semantic opposition of (at least) co...
Intractable disagreements are commonly analyzed in terms of the semantic opposition of (at least) co...
In this paper, I aim to bring out the implausibility of the claim that there is a class of philosoph...
Many highly educated people think religious belief is irrational and unscientific. If you ask a phil...
Many highly educated people think religious belief is irrational and unscientific. If you ask a phil...
I argue that philosophers of religion should not merely focus on religions but should pay much morea...
I argue that philosophers of religion should not merely focus on religions but should pay much morea...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This unique textbook--the first to offer balanced, comprehensive coverage of all major perspectives ...
Can the 'continuity thesis' upheld by R Boudon - that rationality is an undivided and permanent prop...
Intractable disagreements are commonly analyzed in terms of the semantic opposition of (at least) co...
Intractable disagreements are commonly analyzed in terms of the semantic opposition of (at least) co...
In this paper, I aim to bring out the implausibility of the claim that there is a class of philosoph...
Many highly educated people think religious belief is irrational and unscientific. If you ask a phil...
Many highly educated people think religious belief is irrational and unscientific. If you ask a phil...
I argue that philosophers of religion should not merely focus on religions but should pay much morea...
I argue that philosophers of religion should not merely focus on religions but should pay much morea...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This essay discusses the nature of religious belief and where its rationality lies. It looks at whet...
This unique textbook--the first to offer balanced, comprehensive coverage of all major perspectives ...
Can the 'continuity thesis' upheld by R Boudon - that rationality is an undivided and permanent prop...
Intractable disagreements are commonly analyzed in terms of the semantic opposition of (at least) co...
Intractable disagreements are commonly analyzed in terms of the semantic opposition of (at least) co...