This ambitious book attempts to do just what it says on the tin: rather than offering an assessment for or against Wittgenstein’s philosophy it sets out to ‘‘say what Wittgenstein means’’. The author talks of ‘‘settling’’ for interpretation, but is also aware of the enormous controversy between scholars over which readings or approaches are to be preferred. Duncan Richter hopes to navigate this treacherous terrain by sticking close to what Wittgenstein says about his methodology (hence taking him at his word) while at the same time attending to how his approach manifests itself, not only in what he wrote about it but also in what and how he wrote on various topics––and, indeed, in what he did not write on issues of philosophical and persona...
This work challenges the assumption that Wittgenstein’s comments about the word “philosophy” are alw...
Wittgenstein published next to nothing on the philosophy of religion and yet his conception of relig...
The principal thesis for which I will argue is that: not only is Wittgenstein, as is too often thoug...
Wittgenstein comes up with his model simply through starting with the assumption that language can b...
What is the true worth of Wittgenstein\u27s contribution to philosophy? Answers to this question are...
A method of philosophy is not independent from a conception of philosophy. The way of understanding...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAWhat is the ultimate value of Wittgenstein's inpu...
There are historically three main trends in understanding Wittgenstein\u27s Tractatus. The first is ...
On my reading, Wittgenstein's seemingly anti-philosophical remarks do not reject philosophy as inher...
Wittgenstein's thought is reflected in his reading and reception of other authors. "Wittgenstein Rea...
It is often claimed that certain remarks by Wittgenstein reveal him to have been an unsympathetic re...
nterpretations of Wittgenstein’s work notoriously fuel debate and controversy. This holds true not o...
Any discussion of Wittgenstein's philosophical thought would be incomplete without taking notice of ...
What is it to mean, or to think? According to Wittgenstein, the mainstream Western philosopher’s ty...
IN HIS TRACTATUS LOGICO-PHILOSOPHICUS, WITTGENSTEIN EXPOUNDS AN IMPRES-sive logico-philosophical the...
This work challenges the assumption that Wittgenstein’s comments about the word “philosophy” are alw...
Wittgenstein published next to nothing on the philosophy of religion and yet his conception of relig...
The principal thesis for which I will argue is that: not only is Wittgenstein, as is too often thoug...
Wittgenstein comes up with his model simply through starting with the assumption that language can b...
What is the true worth of Wittgenstein\u27s contribution to philosophy? Answers to this question are...
A method of philosophy is not independent from a conception of philosophy. The way of understanding...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAWhat is the ultimate value of Wittgenstein's inpu...
There are historically three main trends in understanding Wittgenstein\u27s Tractatus. The first is ...
On my reading, Wittgenstein's seemingly anti-philosophical remarks do not reject philosophy as inher...
Wittgenstein's thought is reflected in his reading and reception of other authors. "Wittgenstein Rea...
It is often claimed that certain remarks by Wittgenstein reveal him to have been an unsympathetic re...
nterpretations of Wittgenstein’s work notoriously fuel debate and controversy. This holds true not o...
Any discussion of Wittgenstein's philosophical thought would be incomplete without taking notice of ...
What is it to mean, or to think? According to Wittgenstein, the mainstream Western philosopher’s ty...
IN HIS TRACTATUS LOGICO-PHILOSOPHICUS, WITTGENSTEIN EXPOUNDS AN IMPRES-sive logico-philosophical the...
This work challenges the assumption that Wittgenstein’s comments about the word “philosophy” are alw...
Wittgenstein published next to nothing on the philosophy of religion and yet his conception of relig...
The principal thesis for which I will argue is that: not only is Wittgenstein, as is too often thoug...