The editors described this as provocative and I was eager to be informed and challenged. O\u27Regan\u27s claim to be sympathetic to Critical Accounting and his promise to articulate in sober terms gave way to O\u27Regan\u27s frustration, distain and ultimately to reveal his confusion. If previous authoritive writers have failed to inform or enlighten, what contribution could I make? Do I respond the emotive phrases used. Do I sensor me responses? Or should I be amused and have some fun too? I have decided to do all three by offering two commentaries; one which takes O\u27Regans\u27s paper seriously and I also offer an uncensored commentary which is playful and indulges in stretching the concept of poetic licence . O\u27Regan refers to ...
As accounting academics, we have a responsibility to act in the public interest as conscience, criti...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
I am pleased to have been asked to offer somecomments on the editor’s choice article by J. B.Ritchie...
We share [author]’s enthusiasm for literature. Original and fresh thinking is to be welcomed. We are...
My insight into the long road to publishing has produced six enlightened Commentaries, which I belie...
We thank the Editors of this Journal for encouraging this discourse and specifically for asking us t...
First paragraph: We share the enthusiasm of Lister (2010) for literature. Original and fresh thinkin...
<p>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to “Analysing accounting disco...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to “Analysing accounting discourse: avo...
This essay represents a reflection on some of the authors’ experiences and is an attempt to articula...
Purpose - The paper outlines my reactions on reading Tony Tinker's paper: "The withering of criticis...
International audienceThis paper provides an overview of the emergence of Critical Perspectives on A...
Purpose – A reply to Tony Tinker's paper, “The withering of criticism”. Design/methodology/approa...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to “Analysing accounting discourse: avo...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
As accounting academics, we have a responsibility to act in the public interest as conscience, criti...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
I am pleased to have been asked to offer somecomments on the editor’s choice article by J. B.Ritchie...
We share [author]’s enthusiasm for literature. Original and fresh thinking is to be welcomed. We are...
My insight into the long road to publishing has produced six enlightened Commentaries, which I belie...
We thank the Editors of this Journal for encouraging this discourse and specifically for asking us t...
First paragraph: We share the enthusiasm of Lister (2010) for literature. Original and fresh thinkin...
<p>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to “Analysing accounting disco...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to “Analysing accounting discourse: avo...
This essay represents a reflection on some of the authors’ experiences and is an attempt to articula...
Purpose - The paper outlines my reactions on reading Tony Tinker's paper: "The withering of criticis...
International audienceThis paper provides an overview of the emergence of Critical Perspectives on A...
Purpose – A reply to Tony Tinker's paper, “The withering of criticism”. Design/methodology/approa...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to “Analysing accounting discourse: avo...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
As accounting academics, we have a responsibility to act in the public interest as conscience, criti...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
I am pleased to have been asked to offer somecomments on the editor’s choice article by J. B.Ritchie...