Add to ORKGImmigration Minister Kevin Andrews’ decision to cancel Dr Mohamed Haneef’s visa has potentially condemned him to years in immigration detention followed by deportation – even if he is acquitted of the charges against him. But there are telling precedents in Australian history for questioning the wisdom of Andrews’ decision. [Introduction
Under s 501 of the Migration Act 1958, a delegate of the Minister for Immigration may cancel or refu...
In July 2011, Australia and Malaysia entered into an arrangement in which Australian asylum seekers ...
In a 2011 decision, the High Court of Australia effectively incorporated an international treaty int...
The federal government\u27s treatment of Mohamed Haneef recalls the infamous case of Egon Kisch, wri...
Kevin Andrews acted precipitately and in error on Mohamed Haneef, writes ANDREW LYNCH YESTERDAY&rsq...
This article critically examines legislative reforms to the ‘character test’, related changes to pol...
Exclusion and expulsion from Australia has, largely, been achieved via the application of s 501 Migr...
[Extract] On 22 December 2014 the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (the Minister) issu...
This article describes the rise of character provisions in Australian migration laws over the last 1...
An increasing number of detainees are in immigration detention because their visas have been cancell...
On April 9, the Federal Government suspended the processing of protection visa applications by Sri L...
This article offers a critical analysis of the norms, policy, procedures and outcomes associated wit...
Under a web of provisions in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (‘Migration Act’), both the Minister for H...
In April 2018, the Federal Government announced an inquiry into the visa cancellation review process...
The compliance section of Australia’s Department of Immigration enforces the departure of 10,000 peo...
Under s 501 of the Migration Act 1958, a delegate of the Minister for Immigration may cancel or refu...
In July 2011, Australia and Malaysia entered into an arrangement in which Australian asylum seekers ...
In a 2011 decision, the High Court of Australia effectively incorporated an international treaty int...
The federal government\u27s treatment of Mohamed Haneef recalls the infamous case of Egon Kisch, wri...
Kevin Andrews acted precipitately and in error on Mohamed Haneef, writes ANDREW LYNCH YESTERDAY&rsq...
This article critically examines legislative reforms to the ‘character test’, related changes to pol...
Exclusion and expulsion from Australia has, largely, been achieved via the application of s 501 Migr...
[Extract] On 22 December 2014 the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (the Minister) issu...
This article describes the rise of character provisions in Australian migration laws over the last 1...
An increasing number of detainees are in immigration detention because their visas have been cancell...
On April 9, the Federal Government suspended the processing of protection visa applications by Sri L...
This article offers a critical analysis of the norms, policy, procedures and outcomes associated wit...
Under a web of provisions in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (‘Migration Act’), both the Minister for H...
In April 2018, the Federal Government announced an inquiry into the visa cancellation review process...
The compliance section of Australia’s Department of Immigration enforces the departure of 10,000 peo...
Under s 501 of the Migration Act 1958, a delegate of the Minister for Immigration may cancel or refu...
In July 2011, Australia and Malaysia entered into an arrangement in which Australian asylum seekers ...
In a 2011 decision, the High Court of Australia effectively incorporated an international treaty int...